From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:03:56 -0800 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <546A1C6C.3000803@cs.ucla.edu> References: <87r3x2qyjg.fsf@wanadoo.es> <546973D0.7050306@cs.ucla.edu> <87ioieqxbb.fsf@wanadoo.es> <54697A45.1040505@cs.ucla.edu> <87egt1rhy4.fsf@wanadoo.es> <546A11D5.3090402@cs.ucla.edu> <838uj9ddl5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416240376 23209 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2014 16:06:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 17 17:06:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqOoc-0001nz-0m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:06:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48628 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqOob-0007kP-Ip for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:06:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45214) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqOmu-0005f3-Mn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:04:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqOmn-0007RL-50 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:04:24 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:54048) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqOmf-0007P9-4T; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:04:09 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2C4A60069; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:04:08 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QOOsSTHOOC-O; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:04:00 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-71-177-17-123.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.177.17.123]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5128A60049; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:03:56 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 In-Reply-To: <838uj9ddl5.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.62 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177434 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Isn't that so in the patch? Which parts of the patch, excluding > configure.ac, would you consider not Windows-specific? Sorry, I didn't read the rest of the patch carefully. If this symbol is needed only for code specific to that platform I agree that ms-w32.h is a better home for its definition.