From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: need help adjusting workflow to git (or vice versa) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:10:45 -0800 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <54651045.6080901@cs.ucla.edu> References: <87zjbvt8o3.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <5464DC5F.8070607@gmx.at> <87oasaubfc.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415909486 23442 80.91.229.3 (13 Nov 2014 20:11:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 13 21:11:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xp0jd-0006HG-Px for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:11:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33729 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xp0jd-00064B-BF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:11:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xp0jU-00062l-7x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:11:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xp0jJ-0008LI-Ff for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:11:08 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:52250) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xp0jJ-0008LA-4n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:10:57 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF985A600C3; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:10:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LqwGBCPCGFDJ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:10:46 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from penguin.cs.ucla.edu (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F927A600C5; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:10:46 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 In-Reply-To: <87oasaubfc.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.62 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177001 Archived-At: On 11/13/2014 11:51 AM, Stephen Berman wrote: > I would be very surprised if either of these approaches is used by most > developers using git, because if so, I'd have expected them to be part > of the standard toolkit and well documented. "git clone" is part of the standard Git toolkit, and is well documented. It's what I use for your scenario, if I understand the scenario correctly. And "git clone" should be fast enough; for Emacs it takes 1.3 seconds on my 3-year-old desktop's hard disk.