From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18912: 24.4; mode-line corruption on graphical frames in dual-headed display Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 10:41:48 +0100 Message-ID: <54574DDC.9020608@gmx.at> References: <54524135.8090405@gnu.org> <8361ezz56z.fsf@gnu.org> <5454D7EB.6060407@gnu.org> <83sii3xecv.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415007808 20812 80.91.229.3 (3 Nov 2014 09:43:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 09:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18912@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Bruno =?UTF-8?Q?F=C3=A9lix?= Rezende Ribeiro Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 03 10:43:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XlEAS-000401-IZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 10:43:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33155 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlEAS-0006Bl-4S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 04:43:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlEAI-0006BB-Eh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 04:43:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlEAA-0007bf-U7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 04:43:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49602) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlEAA-0007bX-Qi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 04:43:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XlEAA-0008Aj-DI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 04:43:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 09:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18912 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18912-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18912.141500772431311 (code B ref 18912); Mon, 03 Nov 2014 09:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18912) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2014 09:42:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46815 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XlE9D-00088u-PY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 04:42:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:60154) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XlE9A-00088O-AF for 18912@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 04:42:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [178.191.137.128] ([178.191.137.128]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MJjOu-1Xk7gJ0mDU-001Bwo; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 10:41:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83sii3xecv.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+H2KvqO8MZfZsH5HtcKlOOrfTSDg4sWi++e2QZTTm0vU5gyYIfQ 6Sw1/ofsKuYXpRv1ZUkj8I9rjljRRbi5HrmDbItCG8WHGsVu9iQ4BaBCTlwy8ooq4TKYhf2 uwueuBcoITrx349Z/6pT5dgqi9tJDwURbB0PC9fQdkUwkJTEamvlcKS17PPfCx1wdlW9+Mo qRAGzxSjckMoPhW2L45ug== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:95423 >> (window-height) ==> 34 >> (window-pixel-height) ==> 613 > > Thanks. > > I don't see anything strange here, the 1-pixel difference shouldn't > have caused what you see. > > Martin, any suggestions how to dig into this further? > >> Interesting enough, '(window-pixel-height)' returns different values for >> both configurations under the "same" circumstances. Furthermore, in >> both configurations '(window-height)' returns one line more than what >> was actually shown. Therefore, both expressions seem to suggest an "off >> by one" bug. > > I see no bug here: both functions return the height of the window > including the mode line, so the value sounds correct if you have 33 > lines of text in that window. Bruno: Could you please post the results of evaluating (window--dump-frame) here. The results are in a buffer called *window-frame-dump*. Please do it for the good and the corrupted frame. Thanks, martin