From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs's set-frame-size can not work well with gnome-shell? Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 14:45:10 +0100 Message-ID: <542b3f74-50f0-6ca6-cc43-b0636e6dde4d@gmx.at> References: <2056a194.3971.16f8d4dd4c5.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <7c344291-8161-eff1-b07b-fb764535abef@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="123916"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: tumashu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 11 14:52:28 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iqH88-0011TV-Db for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 14:48:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57718 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqH86-0003ks-ML for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 08:48:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38171) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqH4t-0002ez-Kv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 08:45:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqH4s-0001rJ-GP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 08:45:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:59905) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqH4s-0001gI-0D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 08:45:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1578750310; bh=Uj6Cfy5qvMdS2iIkFMnY2326nZmXrh1qRn8yLBcOw0E=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=NVtxi7RZco0nFGdZCMVuV8iW8yJ85v8A+JiYUbQ7j8GbFXylarsuzIPiCgPY6Y9Av L4JHH9uhl6tOSaKHruvm/eFldbLZcGvDqP1T3cdE7JqM7inImXuOgqR2xUJ1iOqlqd DFhGoE74G7xpjBxttnZXY7ZxA0UOI8oB5xoQ38XI= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([46.125.249.69]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N17UQ-1jo3l13iQ6-012Xp7; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 14:45:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: de-AT X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:/MIAR2igv4sj9I2VC89ykKx8XCDIInRYeddw6O5F1iBfLrw095B NXXekCyd2npbg6TO+YoCfkFEmmiAJA961SbbQSMp+woiABb8flGY6wjrp8T2wjMvK0h7ZHy VfMLlGszUuH3Iet6Rl6rxjzL3iSngUUkfH2eWFzuPEsPFtlF1gLAZdhBeYlSRvbYTAGcNM2 fH8w2nmZrHFZ+uf4wojyA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:OTisbyAOVfM=:dQSmyZemhhGy11gmWU3WtK 00MHM4oAiTRkvaj43aBsOsQpWZjBe6TIc/A95Fy8tAvWgwHW3unA2pMNi0hObDrcqihup8FfZ cauABUixNdUS1oe4t+7dxw4iza/tAdV4j9OSZryzoEnfVhesqboIlxSWrZ3X3/GY9CsC/ifU8 A1zDHGz/SD2N8+YmaxbhiC7xtehLlmg60jrAyXPn75uBr83T8tWJRSXG7HOqX3WUsfYlAB0Ae ol2mEi+xwVzVRys8CVMesq1x4gu+Zgrs1egf0z8uFJrkjC7ZXRABhgwFWgD3o2ki7qE+iiLgD K0zthhGc+jLlOHykyZe4bZ4d9SuMyPrcmpiPi2Mv+4X1LaGDKlVJ0z9UJ4+80wfcllbf4bB40 ZtWchRPNjI5a6s1p39OdpCmsVKVguKuST+zkxkhSzZ23782+1RDtSy6rYjY/KOEmT2MK/KVUS Sr+Xha82PCMhJ4QybHoAXhDr9GkdJQI0+F9D63mj6+A3AB1ZdJ8F/EtuqVsvTstBQK2IdBMsu zr4tOnyLZq9VujMMHdSFBjrm5KXqdyZ71M5F3ZX5B5XtrXMZ0zu/pALfdaKWCgMV/Wb7cILuk CBfTouQLJyapN0ifM/Du3gAqNwTVyGT5M9xLUy16D0VWhjEd5ks4ufUhtwBh8Z6xb42cOxq3l zU1HYtz+t5xQNiGvIH1pAFsWrCJNb/z65bX6OKeltGCiCW2KdHdzLZIMWH4aFB7UmJ/4UATnU hNHj+ZR50d5Ec3YU4IQfIbPDggvK2T5RBWKy0l5bQGJh/UKIztOGviPmkm8FwFDG7FF6q2U8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:244199 Archived-At: >> In >> particular, a program like GNOME-shell that, as we've seen in >> Bug#38452, seems to have its own interpretation of coordinates (I have >> no idea what GNOME-shell is and does). > > I think resizing problem is not this reason. Unless mutter decides that it may have to move the child frame because resizing would clash with some of its internal positioning constraints. >> Is it resizing only or moving the frame too? > > I think resizing only, moving works well. Does resizing fail always? Even with 'frame-resize-pixelwise' non-nil and shrinking or increasing an edge by one pixel only? Please look also at the questions I asked Dmitry. martin