From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current trunk aborts with MinGW Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:57:46 +0200 Message-ID: <542AD2FA.9090603@gmx.at> References: <542A690D.9080500@gmx.at> <83lhp1kw5i.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1412092711 2246 80.91.229.3 (30 Sep 2014 15:58:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 30 17:58:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XYzol-0005r3-7k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:58:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44076 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYzok-0005Ns-OJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:58:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59655) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYzoa-0005Me-5O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:58:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYzoS-0005T7-Dk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:58:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:49291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYzoJ-0005NS-9e; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:57:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [178.190.167.139] ([178.190.167.139]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MCcOw-1XPg8S43HO-009TIQ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:57:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83lhp1kw5i.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:f5ey1yWY+Qa5ByLNR35Mg+J6okvbqXrvqvs5beLBhIyPnUs9VUD EkDbVYUh6OKFwTWPWCjhu0wVcuuTZP5VtGTa9KmfZwn89D0aKHZAffK0nsJooRw6OHNR2Sj ozOEEcfb+VuPtvdymY1jSCiM1OPc1e59kKccNSmuM0hcwNTOmRiIo1OAtSVFRW/QNzQAqxo icZFlMAjCuBx9K98fMduA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:174861 Archived-At: > We could also add a test to functions which allocate memory for Lisp > objects that they are called in the main thread. Patches for that are > welcome. Very welcome, indeed. martin