From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposing changes to adjust_frame_size Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 10:44:37 +0200 Message-ID: <54259dfb-3ca4-f3b0-8344-f3de5106d286@gmx.at> References: <69a5e928-2998-f776-fa0d-f35e6ab1e65d@gmx.at> <1b11ac72-6687-f2d4-1d9f-0619d6d2462c@gmx.at> <87v97ww8h4.fsf@gnu.org> <87eaa667-b3cd-0274-669c-3cb4e0076ce0@gmx.at> <87sg30vy7w.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmy3x620.fsf@gnu.org> <52a5361a-451e-7167-edfd-09066dfdcc3e@gmx.at> <875yzt907k.fsf@gnu.org> <0633b8ac-de8e-b57a-f3f4-804c5efb009a@gmx.at> <874kfdtj5l.fsf@gnu.org> <37f3ce19-d858-111e-a5aa-06c24803e17b@gmx.at> <87v97tvt7e.fsf@gnu.org> <726883d4-8d13-a3cb-30b7-a74c4b44f8ed@gmx.at> <87a6p3iv9q.fsf@gnu.org> <48753133-11a3-a21f-a1f9-4e58508079ac@gmx.at> <36f3b7b6-b81c-2e89-99c8-0a8837ef7869@gmx.at> <874kfabe7j.fsf@gnu.org> <1de34884-dfa3-92ba-8c6d-d256dcbb5d2b@gmx.at> <871raebctt.fsf@gnu.org> <87sg2tr4u4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30762"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Garjola Dindi , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 12 10:46:42 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lgkVu-0007qd-8o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 10:46:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41702 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgkVt-0005P1-Ab for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 04:46:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgkU1-0004Jn-2X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 04:44:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:56743) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgkTz-0004M8-0T; Wed, 12 May 2021 04:44:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620809079; bh=TiKcatV3IxNVPgsmNZMjEfwhTmJXlKwcmS63U7VL5a8=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ET4kDYZy/ahwvI/yi+1r7wxY3k22IWuR+BdDi33KKs7HnbjoA86jQa+CzJbLTeqxt zAaTddfCTxVE5hbXGCHXGGc0FmWGJmh90OWbK1oEEiP+lYKL2ZSEXarU5GfrLKuabE 7qXp7KONKYpl3k8PpxZJ/tEh8n3yWm0+Z8VzztMI= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.249.51]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MWAOW-1m05s43EQE-00Xel7; Wed, 12 May 2021 10:44:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87sg2tr4u4.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:VkQ7MTgXbTGCMJ4owujFxfYjDfnya8A6s3icFyjevxP1mmxrq7a 7CMXUFMGHDqfp2hFTuEni9DwZbJkOgMhmLwxkOS1F2CMWPOdd3k7Zd6e7oizqjrWAstT5Pf 3VK+Fb6T1zItTnmmGmtpKcFfCrr50zfRWm/9Ck4e8ws69gukvVpFWqG0ry3EvZ/9JUtEDk6 B+ugul3nFo7BdVX6wV3Bw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:8g4fEpBeY5M=:6+B/S6hY96bPcvl+JXx8C/ FbYa/DZNtZeCvpOMvylugUuLWZovwonZm9iKlvodYuX4xUEZgohv3SvjRNIj/1F+KjbG/q91i Rmfno76UeJLOzMMm/39NSHmsbXniY/Qy1a+NQ1X9HLK1xEZkwG8dr4Q34dDHw+gXuKvLPVaUF 2kBd6cFbjmz2iScHzjwdd1NLMnwRlGRxB0/pdUhiBSkgj44Hcd+Dlyg6D7MzwDzU72PbhfAEh RNAA3gWrv3qM5TW+x+iXCBDuvtpznC2HMopiE57ZjB53YI+kWAdukBu+LQ21qQo1vTej9Z4ND gqWJakMG5ehK8EEv4uEDf7GxRa6b2bMcHy9zMR3oU71XeLOIK3oMHhE0X+1baIATWQZW4Sshy fMFUD8p/ACLBwh76ob9aSC3xtlIM7FM2Um1vWiTX1RI2zg8vwxQYVIooNrMqhoq2gLY7S8rNL NvUq2tSey4Ln+vVyPfmnfUlvReGZjQpkJ8hBGV2rWjSErI9fjZRCIM4XgmvXZtd/8ihhXZEKs 5CH3dQr66xXZAWIgOXDUOiwnYBNJYN5IHAGqCu4/cMnEDJRiGMQ+OUf7En/mwpjD8ZoG8YS4/ KBL6BDsYNumLjOjenZl8pqbIbMJpdhBjFfptljGLRfiKPPu7UgsU8jP6mlkWYC4P3NLnIyf1N jhQ3953jV44Do89Zb57RtuX2K1UBgHOQofDYOVDiSvRDMH5moiJP6JWN7iBFedf1CZqpy1FsV ooBQBUyLdko+iOWjk8CGqMN/zl3nMPXYqW2XCgQ3cyJJk/OE+PEmJaCIPd/NXW0QPbsAWJXL Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.15; envelope-from=rudalics@gmx.at; helo=mout.gmx.net X-Spam_score_int: -3 X-Spam_score: -0.4 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=1.5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269194 Archived-At: > 11:15 Does it support resize requests? What happens when you make an > already visible frame invisible or iconified? Does it support > size hints? > 11:15 "it" is sway, and frame = WM window. > 11:16 resize requests: yes Funny. I would say that if (!container_is_floating(view->container)) { return; } from the URL below should say "no" but maybe I'm missing something. Can you change the size of a frame by setting its 'width' or 'height' parameter? Does your frame resize when you toggle the vertical scroll bar on/off? > 11:16 size hints: yes We'll look into that, eventually. > 11:16 iconified: iirc that does nothing > 11:16 but not sure > 11:16 all of this assumes an x11 client > 11:17 emersion: Yes, right now, emacs is an x11 client (GTK3 built). > 11:18 What does sway when a new emacs frame should be mapped and > requests a certain size? It's at least not honored in tiling > mode which is obviously fine. > 11:25 https://github.com/swaywm/sway/blob/31b4b96ebf2af88630752d8518fd360ff84cf3e5/sway/desktop/xwayland.c#L584 > 11:28 Thanks! > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > >> ... and this is our usual annoyance. I attached a new patch which >> should handle these cases as well. If there's anything else left, >> please tell me. > > The new version handles all cases we've had so far. Thanks! I've pushed it now. It should fail in the usual manner with (setq frame (make-frame '((visibility . nil) (width . 80)))) (make-frame-visible frame) Please verify. And many thanks for testing, martin