From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7822: 24.0.50; `fit-window-to-buffer': take display artefacts into account Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:42:57 +0200 Message-ID: <54205FA1.7020106@gmx.at> References: <541F129D.3000402@gmx.at> <541FE5A4.8030900@gmx.at> <867a1372-84f3-4c30-89df-49cc2cbd06dc@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1411407874 22881 80.91.229.3 (22 Sep 2014 17:44:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:44:34 +0000 (UTC) To: Drew Adams , 7822-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 22 19:44:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XW7f1-0006M1-BA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:44:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48000 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XW7f0-00085U-VO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:44:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46760) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XW7eq-00082a-Mg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:44:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XW7ei-000308-5S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:44:16 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57523) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XW7ei-0002zb-2A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:44:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XW7ec-0006zn-6O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7822 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7822-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D7822.141140778526808 (code D ref 7822); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7822-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2014 17:43:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49087 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XW7dg-0006yJ-EC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:43:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:50478) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XW7dd-0006xu-U9 for 7822-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.166.82.229] ([194.166.82.229]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M39zL-1YOu9L2snX-00sxOm; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:43:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <867a1372-84f3-4c30-89df-49cc2cbd06dc@default> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:fQy1UkcJiLzlHqv7sMbCt/6jIWiUa0DIersBuahOcbunKKGP0Bp y2DebZ/p14U9gXfwh/M6Y5yDZ595g0g2WbtHE4/aSmsVcmrVpcEa04ZjIH9tmyVMGzIWXuf e2/D8Oy/65M7hyedR8lTRramTljEMkIZulyoBnF//7MKttHrF8jkNF294EIYXlmftXnHNSb QbNqhY2HUqkimM9O1ghlw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93636 Archived-At: > But is this enhancement request really fulfilled? The paragraph > after the intro one that you quote from the ER specifically > states the requirement: > > How much it tries to do so should be under programmer > control, so that, e.g., one could tell it (e.g. via a new > optional parameter) not to take any display stuff into account > (i.e., to treat the buffer content as just plain text with a > fixed-width font of the current char size). > > And the ER explicitly refers to this emacs-devel thread for > details: "`fit-window-to-buffer-as-displayed'?", 2011-01-10: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-01/msg00323.html The current behavior is, in fact, based on Stefan's remark that There's no point trying to add support for some properties but not all: adding support for all properties is likely to be easier because it'd rely on (re)using the existing display code. in that thread. > And of course, how users can control the behavior needs to be > well documented. > > Is this ER really addressed? I don't have a Windows binary > more recent than 2014-08-15 to test (they are no longer being > built, it seems). The changes are from 2013 so the binaries you have should include them. > If so, then yes this should be closed. > > If not then it should not be closed, even if it is good that > some progress has apparently been made. Thanks. If you can give a practical example where the present code fails to do what you want, feel free to reopen the bug. Thanks, martin