From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16598: 24.3.50; Document predefined frame parameters missing from the Elisp manual Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:17:10 +0200 Message-ID: <541BE686.6030109@gmx.at> References: <05d81235-3ef2-4344-bae7-1d4bf5435c6c@default> <52EA9E21.4080605@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1411114716 25785 80.91.229.3 (19 Sep 2014 08:18:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16598-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 19 10:18:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XUtOb-00078o-IG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:18:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56756 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUtOb-0004Op-5J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 04:18:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54064) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUtOR-0004Og-5U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 04:18:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUtOJ-0002y2-NK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 04:18:15 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53559) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUtOJ-0002xN-Jv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 04:18:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XUtOE-00049s-8P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 04:18:02 -0400 Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 16598 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 16598@debbugs.gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at, drew.adams@oracle.com Original-Received: via spool by 16598-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D16598.141111464515930 (code D ref 16598); Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16598-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2014 08:17:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45120 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XUtNc-00048r-Gd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 04:17:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:63803) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XUtNa-00048h-03 for 16598-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 04:17:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [178.190.17.206] ([178.190.17.206]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MAQMg-1XaujH2klW-00BeMm; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:17:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <52EA9E21.4080605@gmx.at> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:W0pXoPUcqFke2OpngJfHyGrZoG92skYDyuU8L2QJrb7aqpGCRux JxoPjJn39Un9jGW4+q6RIH8nB//CcsWBPnfX7ssq4eayKDzNNwb7j1fmqdAkz27caw4b5WX IYiznhq7Pcnd3ZIB1yc1gwbNuJmqjDTtfVipCRu2pHLk06QRVScbXWwowZ0Ud5v04zalHc1 DQnLWhCu9KGMYLXPMxUsg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93501 Archived-At: `right-divider-width' and `bottom-divider-width' have been documented now. Closing this bug. Thanks, martin