Re: libsigsegv?

[Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>]

On 09/11/2014 08:04 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> But what is your take on this?

I don't like to discuss nearly the same things twice:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2014-02/msg00063.html

> But libsigsegv already did all those tricks, and it stays stable for
> quites some time on many platforms (the long and impressive list is in
> the library, I suggest to take a look).  So why not use all that
> knowledge and experience?

"Use" != "link with that library".

> Besides, other projects do that (e.g., Gawk).  I don't see why we
> shouldn't.

Not on my system, BTW:

$ ldd /usr/bin/gawk
         linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fffe5b54000)
	libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000003291400000)
	libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000003291000000)
	libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003290c00000)
	/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003290800000)

AFAICS Fedora guys uses --with-libsigsegv-prefix=no for gawk since 2009.

Dmitry