From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Phil Sainty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Performance under bidi-paragraph-direction 'left-to-right vs bidi-display-reordering nil Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 21:42:18 +1300 Message-ID: <540e6d02-3e4b-e1f2-2055-46feb7ef8288@orcon.net.nz> References: <06329813-a32a-2eb8-61b9-337b67d84a4c@orcon.net.nz> <831rtxtgc1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="101638"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 30 09:42:30 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iayKj-000QKY-Us for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 09:42:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38410 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iayKi-0001fQ-3l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 03:42:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iayKc-0001fI-VS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 03:42:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iayKb-0005XN-RA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 03:42:22 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-4.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.59]:45325) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iayKb-0005Qt-GS; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 03:42:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [116.251.203.246] (port=48607 helo=[192.168.20.103]) by smtp-4.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iayKY-0000RF-Os; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 21:42:18 +1300 In-Reply-To: <831rtxtgc1.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-GB X-GeoIP: NZ X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 60.234.4.59 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242911 Archived-At: Just to follow this up, the new `bidi-inhibit-bpa' option added in bug#38407 was also exactly what was needed to resolve the performance issue I had alluded to here. -Phil