From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Antipov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r117765: Add vectors support to Fsort. Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 20:34:25 +0400 Message-ID: <5400AB91.6040705@yandex.ru> References: <83fvgfinea.fsf@gnu.org> <46022C7F-2478-4350-BBB9-966D5978B7D5@gmail.com> <54009F10.3030706@yandex.ru> <9587A0FE-5EA4-4B9C-96A0-DED059AB6AC1@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409330919 31967 80.91.229.3 (29 Aug 2014 16:48:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jordon Biondo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 29 18:48:33 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XNPLh-0003Z1-Po for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 18:48:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43196 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNPLg-0004K9-UN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:48:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNP8F-0006NN-5d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:34:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNP87-0003rd-R6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:34:35 -0400 Original-Received: from forward10l.mail.yandex.net ([84.201.143.143]:54856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNP87-0003rR-JC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:34:27 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (smtp13.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.68]) by forward10l.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 2A428BA1221; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 20:34:26 +0400 (MSK) Original-Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id AE3D0E400D6; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 20:34:25 +0400 (MSK) Original-Received: from unknown (unknown [37.139.80.10]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id BXjt14K2ip-YPvK3DiH; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 20:34:25 +0400 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Yandex-Uniq: 0a38d8ab-1770-4547-b46d-87bcb714d590 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1409330065; bh=r7u8OQRGnZO55FUsVYRtp8PvM1kUAdLWtjZvwo7a/Ek=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=SRQ6CDCnrGMjxRUwrmlA4kaMpR+4FU2xhgiXYFR+JuPuXdz5Ay/mtXkr9vOArzv4y sCFAABv6woJJlvP6Q6hMRfXkkKwcAXmjIv78EacXS88ruqKNAoTkQXcYmrM/43LfJk uymI/AzAG7duqNc0J6NB7nQ/kFyBKlf8doBcQvWg= Authentication-Results: smtp13.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 In-Reply-To: <9587A0FE-5EA4-4B9C-96A0-DED059AB6AC1@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 84.201.143.143 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173892 Archived-At: On 08/29/2014 07:50 PM, Jordon Biondo wrote: > 8720000 67104768 is my output. Good, 8720000 looks like a valid limit. Can you also verify that running an endless recursion with huge max-lisp-eval-depth, e.g.: (setq max-specpdl-size 83200000 max-lisp-eval-depth 640000) (defun f1 () (f1)) (f1) doesn't crash but throws you to a top-level editing loop? Thanks, Dmitry