From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11817: 24.1.50; Useless code in `kmacro-call-macro' Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:35:46 -0400 Message-ID: <53ipe0zi6l.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87395err6a.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341610575 5336 80.91.229.3 (6 Jul 2012 21:36:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 21:36:15 +0000 (UTC) To: 11817-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 06 23:36:15 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SnGC9-0002yD-Vh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 23:36:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60567 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnGC9-0004q2-17 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:36:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnGC5-0004oh-LJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:36:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnGC2-0002DJ-TU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:36:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnGC2-0002D1-QU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SnGGs-00018L-ER for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:41:02 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 21:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 11817 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 11817@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 11817-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D11817.13416108504328 (code D ref 11817); Fri, 06 Jul 2012 21:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11817-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jul 2012 21:40:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53356 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SnGGf-00017l-E8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:40:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:39595) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SnGGd-00017d-8i for 11817-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnGBm-0003d4-IL; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:35:46 -0400 X-Spook: Treasury military assassinate digicash basement Bellcore X-Ran: YCoq]s@&-#B7r)^F6jN,@7$h7{d#wbUmqr6L~6~3joC(|qr?:&1&63:LVT.6F^h}0RUQr! X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:20:29 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:61672 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >> There used to be a "(Type e to repeat macro)" message after running a >> macro. Now there isn't. I wonder why, since it has nothing to do with >> the use of set-temporary-overlay-map AFAICS. > > An oversight on my part, it seems, feel free to re-add it, Done.