From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34024: Segfault when resizing SVG images Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:27:53 -0500 Message-ID: <53d96c09-c7c7-c1f7-d500-70148e6d6f0f@gmail.com> References: <42f6f8f3-6313-0583-2126-6ffdc4cff375@gmail.com> <837efdi3ks.fsf@gnu.org> <834laginn0.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1547162832 14338 195.159.176.226 (10 Jan 2019 23:27:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:27:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 Cc: 34024@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 11 00:27:08 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ghjj8-0003Zl-Qv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:27:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45862 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghjlF-0005c2-QB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:29:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghjl1-0005a8-LN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:29:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghjl0-0000ed-SB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:29:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55092) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghjl0-0000cv-Ki for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ghjl0-0006H4-4i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34024 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 34024-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34024.154716288324044 (code B ref 34024); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34024) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2019 23:28:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54373 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ghjk2-0006Fk-V9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:28:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:39299) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ghjk1-0006FG-Iq for 34024@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:28:01 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-f174.google.com with SMTP id u47so16055703qtj.6 for <34024@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:28:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cW7QJL0Lr+sPuHnPMTuxbj0O1gq/e4WKHf3VJMwyDi4=; b=mz3PrZo0/qMICX80ZchrSCXzolHOIGSBsFQdt/CjMDRAQixkOWov/OvMVlBg848FVr OkMPTX57tQ72ghT7GZaRAhZfCJgN59LPsUX3Z8QJHM9x/tqo9RwI5SkNU8f70lHsThqG H0T3GI/7ik/6vPQmzlNxeOxi0jsZddb3BWnDg8JnB2RZ4gW+GOx86WUMWpH4BPXk2BaF Sed8nkGmYbzr0/dgaXXLx9djusmU2lyDNP5aGqTN+K7Bm52G8ov6ri/AopsaHCEvLKoI hzgBJ6mPc5mal/l2UEDqBlIUGyGX/zognUf0PiiSGO8sd7RMzQXDcWSv/IYMLwRV43Qt 7cDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cW7QJL0Lr+sPuHnPMTuxbj0O1gq/e4WKHf3VJMwyDi4=; b=tiTn8M6yk1HWrSWL3WNPNe50pX+iTDknLEhShm6B9o923Pvx7wdW4OfRQyIva/EHNV MYSBtj80mij9x5J/Ip0/4VlI34rcyKl6+eXOSbNaL9NQUAz5yxSlSo9abXaZm/z46oC7 D7WJM/gRenBW5oJS7QIOep4wzoxOxoUHFCamW0/KFLoQbVNQhbpHl/TXVCHwJ5W0N8ps ZU79KhzRlgLj9u5VaVO194sZ4n1hmHZH7cInpgjQTszgO+fO6bVH+GeiP95TtLMgCyzf fyd7+5hWqA5UpbuJMX7L8LHZPPQCnfeEmUhJ7Uxm1l3VWekQ61vv804K64qFYtjkEMfo brkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdT7Saw6a57xpHMPLv7J/0iDZOSzFh3qTfl6t9azxK5QDDgB+RI mA7T2g9S0yE+OOAVbK+r6rmyl0kO X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7AX2k+4MLQ6xztmRkYwcWywgD16XjxVHCVZ21JyNH+ziLALjmaHncQgP6ZMq0+V0JYj61fCw== X-Received: by 2002:a37:5807:: with SMTP id m7mr11204791qkb.141.1547162875905; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:27:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?IPv6:2601:184:4180:66e7:50ac:e10b:bbf3:e9d5? ([2601:184:4180:66e7:50ac:e10b:bbf3:e9d5]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e17sm43098878qte.12.2019.01.10.15.27.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:27:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <834laginn0.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-GB X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:154326 Archived-At: On 10/01/2019 09.38, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: 34024@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Clément Pit-Claudel >> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 08:39:00 -0500 >> >> Indeed, I can reproduce the crash in Emacs 24.3. I just meant to clarify which version I had tested things on. > > Thanks for testing. > > I suggest to upgrade (or downgrade) to a more reliable version of > ImageMagick, if that is feasible for you. Thanks, I might try this. > And we hope we will soon > have on master image resize capability that doesn't need ImageMagick, > courtesy of Alan Third. This sounds very exciting. I tried the latest master, which IIUC contains (some of?) Alan's changes, but it doesn't fix the issue yet. Clément.