From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: set-frame-parameter a child-frame's 'parent-frame error on macOS ? Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 20:07:23 +0300 Message-ID: <53c55d98-dbf6-7e6d-eaa5-66e565f93581@yandex.ru> References: <3341a4c3.36ca.160e851bdbd.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <5A5876A3.10402@gmx.at> <87fu7b6zsj.fsf@163.com> <5A5902D9.9070801@gmx.at> <16191b19.1392.160ed773bef.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <5A59C872.1010900@gmx.at> <87tvvqxcxr.fsf@163.com> <5A59F476.1060806@gmx.at> <87mv1hcnw8.fsf@163.com> <5A5B1D46.6000608@gmx.at> <731a3868-e589-978b-ee34-ab72cf5c5aff@yandex.ru> <4d250ebc-7979-3229-b9ea-6e57089d02df@yandex.ru> <5A5C76AC.60308@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1516036230 21232 195.159.176.226 (15 Jan 2018 17:10:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 17:10:30 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:58.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/58.0 Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: martin rudalics , Feng Shu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 15 18:10:26 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eb8Gw-00047s-5d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:10:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48484 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb8Iu-0007j9-0X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:12:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb8EP-0003vS-Bh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:07:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb8EJ-0001RO-K5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:07:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]:38988) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb8EJ-0001Qr-CK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:07:27 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id m8so14171460lfc.6 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:07:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KNGczWdcHQX+yeptKnQc4YurNWuWZNKhdqaoHRB8iV4=; b=Q/ZgO/FcA695bUhVKhQN06sGDWxCuqxlWjOVxpXru24EwPG0eW3qgUPurFQIeRKksO 1MjScnwVtKplfRVQyBSX+uyZtbeftMNI/gmNsPHmWdHHJz47tn7jHx7eNmld+pjVhsI6 pLhopl/q0pm2TegCwSkYlD6nJXciunBXmjp0b4o6oyAHWqDDuXhrkW+1yZHwHBfN6aEg sN1BHE4FsdDx45Xy8T2nH1T0LwYqpDHOSvXxkOWye0NBGk73W9PtmrrJ4CjXhjv8lSeC +NCV+wVY3qqMihLJSPWY6++Ld5rz6452zqbDGv14/FBajbHpeG0oyMJULB8jtHvQwzqb wP5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KNGczWdcHQX+yeptKnQc4YurNWuWZNKhdqaoHRB8iV4=; b=b/81nGkAUbLhplP0y1XJeuUVy9LffJEQTEt236ZY2eHQ0d+w2zO8K2bWI34qw/LYrM XzNmzvw+JLwiWiXdBeLJZDpuKIddgOV1JrJa+4ZCkOUg0vxumNWFqRvtlgIm1/O9oehM Y9XNxIvOMASbPHjPMspoafcbRObtX4T308XIbsV3mH4FHtlNAQTqZfDW633l1wLde+e5 NoWfZvV6hzZ973D/exPHsqyr7VleY/dWvRKMQCXmZjCPw24IRVGJxfd2hIRwMNzxfhla z9VIHZJ8DkjyGMCYOwvhl0p81Xi+SlfyPxiq9YiMa9rtfefVW4SEaYK/prunywGLALOG MIDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfkCghbrqopThlnK/ITCYCnn7m9GTuVUZyIMTgoxa6AjoUPkJof ydYHkUv9FlpAmUlvJZheGle6LTZw X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosQrIfdtNPhsOkVPl09itKLXIwzbMEk7QKW/S9n2emEfroUUgWHn12vDfwWSrDI3A9ATRYO0A== X-Received: by 10.25.56.13 with SMTP id f13mr3849286lfa.16.1516036045745; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:07:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.174] ([178.252.127.239]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 78sm20639ljf.0.2018.01.15.09.07.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:07:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5A5C76AC.60308@gmx.at> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:221976 Archived-At: On 1/15/18 12:38 PM, martin rudalics wrote: > Still not much luck with the video.  I'm told that my video driver > accelerators do not support the resolution 1854x2110 so they are > deactivated.  The result is that I see all sorts of artefacts. Might software rendering work, then? The way to use it depends on the video player, etc. > Anyway, it seems that the "good" frame appears around 00:34 and its > "bad" double around 00:35 of the video.  Is that correct?  If so, > please post simple screencaps with the corresponding timings. I've sent a scaled-down video, hopefully it works. Not sure what you are looking for on the screenshots, though. I can try describing them with text. > And > also please resolve the discrepancy with what Feng Shu says here: > >   when I want to show company-child-frame-menu at , I support >   this position is (20, 50), but before show menu about 0.1s, this menu > will be showed >   at positon (10, 25), and dispear and then show at position (20, 50), >   this is so fast, let menu look flicker. > > namely that the bad frame appears first. That is the description of my experience with Robert's patch applied. Without it applied, the "bad frame" appears last (at position 40-100, approximately). Feng Shu has changed his code since to call set-frame-position much less often, and it seems to work correctly *without* Robert's patch. Quite weird.