From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#9782: 24.0.90; move-to-window-line not taking header line into account Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 12:27:32 +0400 Message-ID: <53EF15F4.6070300@yandex.ru> References: <83mxcyuw60.fsf@gnu.org> <87haiiqwiz.fsf@yandex.ru> <83vc6yf8hr.fsf@gnu.org> <5185CB24.5060207@yandex.ru> <83sj21fmo5.fsf@gnu.org> <518725C3.10107@yandex.ru> <83bo8of4hp.fsf@gnu.org> <51885853.7020803@yandex.ru> <83txmfebzp.fsf@gnu.org> <5188B00C.2080600@yandex.ru> <83ip2uentg.fsf@gnu.org> <518937BF.1070500@yandex.ru> <53EE98D8.5010605@gmail.com> <83oavkeu8v.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1408177692 21735 80.91.229.3 (16 Aug 2014 08:28:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 08:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 16 10:28:05 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XIZLC-00015s-Rm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 10:27:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34743 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XIZLC-00077N-Fh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 04:27:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XIZL1-00077H-6Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 04:27:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XIZKs-0006YJ-5e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 04:27:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]:63652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XIZKr-0006X4-Uh; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 04:27:38 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id mc6so3066330lab.34 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 01:27:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s0J5UJ6Is3AcWka9rfMrRgTR7Sks4CVfoM5a0BL01Xg=; b=QzhjGG6l4V5lALLuqtwGfnK2yD7FA6nztgXOy3jvVmYvdcuD0Wq99rn6sr18819Qk8 3fRt4PKAuuQ2OH6A4Zk3RWMm3KZZF7wNMzvo0+rmhpKT//neWdheFsoDJ9XqfVFhlp7h lVKNMPDAk6jD63IfFT41TqHPO6z9q0bitZ+0XrE8dHZn0TJBudXpYKhIXFn7sBJIhxMr N1wqjUh1oxDfySJjZiEdGamD2bve9hlgl3GkE13LDcOfqp8umGQJ+CcBUxXd593E/uBt lamdUpOx2/Wh90KcxMRiQe0krgFKWUpVy6st+sDoEEdoV7HFu0KteL/aCP5NnaVRvJRX mR8Q== X-Received: by 10.112.158.161 with SMTP id wv1mr15938506lbb.8.1408177656207; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 01:27:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([178.252.98.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id um4sm6756173lbb.40.2014.08.16.01.27.34 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 16 Aug 2014 01:27:35 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 In-Reply-To: <83oavkeu8v.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173703 Archived-At: On 08/16/2014 12:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I don't see this part in the bug discussion. Where did it take place? It had already moved to emacs-devel at that point. > If the only problem with posn-col-row is that it errs by one when > there's a header line, adding one in that case sounds like an easy way > out. Hmm, I guess so. This is now simplified by our droppped support for Emacs <24. Thanks.