From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18215: 24.4.50; OSX 10.6.8; set-frame-size by pixelwise does not work following `make-fame`. Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 19:14:10 +0200 Message-ID: <53E656E2.20804@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1407604527 29452 80.91.229.3 (9 Aug 2014 17:15:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 17:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18215@debbugs.gnu.org To: Keith David Bershatsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 09 19:15:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XGAEh-0004jP-39 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 19:15:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56942 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGAEg-000210-LW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 13:15:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGAEX-0001zt-So for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 13:15:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGAET-0006Ci-6p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 13:15:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGAET-0006CZ-46 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 13:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XGAES-0005DX-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 13:15:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 17:15:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18215 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18215-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18215.140760447919987 (code B ref 18215); Sat, 09 Aug 2014 17:15:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2014 17:14:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36672 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XGAE2-0005CI-At for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 13:14:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:55213) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XGADy-0005C3-Qz for 18215@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 13:14:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [188.23.123.171] ([188.23.123.171]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MPlsg-1XJzhg1x90-0054hz; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 19:14:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Bq5O8tjDh0W52dIj5+QFNkdw0zIpc3jiKSiTQDEQ2PkpDN7cMn7 w+4XbXlwJYkyx3LANWTq4CGJHHtELAHfaSBc6W0oqzAQsXatAyie6/mx7uymCrDvVmF3zQP L/LkrD05+C1eYRwbb6FdElaVFCAbdolGRwzLjmcejfi/dgXRwWpHqUukwL0aweP3z7L/631 Ms0TS6i+3WXRkxBwETYZQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92342 Archived-At: > The patch you provided did indeed fix the problem -- both examples mentioned in the initial bug report now work with the patched build of Emacs Trunk from August 8, 2014. > > I should mention that there is a slight difference between the June 1, 2014 build and the patched build of August 8, 2014. The difference is about six (6) pixels in frame width. With the June 1, 2014 build, I use 1894 to exactly fill the screen that is 1920 pixels wide. With the patched build of August 8, 2014, I would now need to use 1900 to exactly fill that same screen which is 1920 pixels wide. `(frame-pixel-width)` returns 1920 with the patched build following (set-frame-size (selected-frame) 1900 1054 t). Can you please in _both_ builds (that from June and the present one) evaluate (window--dump-frame) and post the contents of the buffer *window-frame-dump* for both builds here. And please keep the CC for 18215@debbugs.gnu.org. Thanks, martin