From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18181: bug in display-buffer-below-selected Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 19:22:37 +0200 Message-ID: <53DFC15D.3060607@gmx.at> References: <2fb33f72-c466-45cb-9bb1-a81881c175bf@me.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1407173024 22711 80.91.229.3 (4 Aug 2014 17:23:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 17:23:44 +0000 (UTC) To: Trevor Jim , 18181@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 04 19:23:38 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XELz0-0004dt-C4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 19:23:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53840 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XELyz-0000X8-UF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:23:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44518) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XELyj-0000OE-2t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:23:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XELyQ-0004Cp-IQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:23:21 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50562) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XELyQ-0004Ce-FW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XELyP-0000IH-RM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 17:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18181 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18181-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18181.14071729741108 (code B ref 18181); Mon, 04 Aug 2014 17:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18181) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2014 17:22:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57505 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XELyI-0000Hn-2z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:22:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:50100) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XELyF-0000HU-0u for 18181@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:22:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [88.117.51.195] ([88.117.51.195]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LomN9-1WXcZG366d-00gqDA; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 19:22:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <2fb33f72-c466-45cb-9bb1-a81881c175bf@me.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:3gVNyzOHD8OE2K02rtx+Ey0DJWa13ASHxw69b7S0pIyLFgvsulc nnJ9r1KmPMcenKy3pc/EYTYLwfy/uz8BxiBgSlKS5y2MP0g8XRUfHLr3K70xWAYMH8069s2 GBqloQK/D3Z2Cl31jtKn2BM9lQhnTQY8ex8iL8j/2Kg/xNsQdGkp8PhIuWTI0ncSkp+4xF/ oPVCkzuCMEYIelavVVRJw== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92097 Archived-At: > Hello. I am seeing what I think is a bug in > display-buffer-below-selected in recent versions of emacs-24.3. > > Namely, if you execute display-buffer-below-selected when the buffer > is already in a window below selected, you will get *two* windows > showing the buffer. A simple test is to run > > (let ((buffer (get-buffer-create "test-buffer"))) > (display-buffer-below-selected buffer nil) > (display-buffer-below-selected buffer nil)) > > in *scratch*. This is the intended behavior. `display-buffer-at-bottom' and `display-buffer--maybe-pop-up-frame-or-window' also display the buffer a second time even if it's already shown. The correct use of this is to try `display-buffer-reuse-window' before `display-buffer-below-selected'. > This behavior seems to have been introduced in git commit > 6a5d9e9a3247566bf69575444e2a1f75f5b3e021 > in the emacs-24 branch of git://git.savannah.gnu.org/emacs.git Can you please tell me which commit this was. I don't have git. Thanks, martin