From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17671: 24.3.91; RET on a link in *Help* buffer resizes *Help* Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:40:39 +0200 Message-ID: <538DC247.3000206@gmx.at> References: <83k38z9mlr.fsf@gnu.org> <538D7794.7050303@gmx.at> <837g4ya0yf.fsf@gnu.org> <538D9861.6070608@gmx.at> <83zjhu8dqr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401799294 22925 80.91.229.3 (3 Jun 2014 12:41:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17671@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 03 14:41:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wro1t-0004tN-1A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:41:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52581 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wro1s-0003o3-Li for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 08:41:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56781) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wro1h-0003bX-7q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 08:41:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wro1Y-0007ju-Fo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 08:41:13 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42917) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wro1Y-0007jn-DT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 08:41:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wro1X-0001z1-SA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 08:41:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:41:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17671 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17671-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17671.14017992587594 (code B ref 17671); Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:41:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2014 12:40:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41793 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wro1R-0001yQ-K9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 08:40:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:52074) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wro1O-0001y5-66 for 17671@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 08:40:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.166.84.179] ([194.166.84.179]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LhfZR-1WVRqH41WD-00mw7s; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:40:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83zjhu8dqr.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gMpYwYzgQlAYqqUgZvEs3aOxeBPM7N0iLqU6MS2tN3Gr6FkwICp o9F23DseWpE7q424ZL1x/S85VhwXxxsl9OzTe/GzhDE+s28oiXdrn4kj+FuaqUlZZTA2Rkv MvfAGvCI2EsF56JvRhxIYxtxDMr8k+OxDTLyux+YHuu/6Rl2aUSn4lrLTniuZSyInnbHQo/ 78OkXrDDMDzWEa9NNCbnQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89938 Archived-At: >> Maybe we should not _decrease_ the size of a window when displaying >> another buffer in it - this would take care of your use case. > > Sounds good to me. OK. I made the change on the release branch. Please test it. Thanks, martin