From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Not a regression, but shuld go into emacs-24 Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 14:31:09 +0200 Message-ID: <538B1D0D.3010102@gmx.at> References: <538B03D4.6030502@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401625904 3151 80.91.229.3 (1 Jun 2014 12:31:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 12:31:44 +0000 (UTC) To: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIERqw6Rydg==?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 01 14:31:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr4vI-00061Z-7N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 14:31:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40750 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr4vH-0000W7-5D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 08:31:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53569) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr4v7-0000W1-Ih for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 08:31:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr4v0-00073b-4l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 08:31:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:56426) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr4uz-00073R-QP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 08:31:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [91.113.6.105] ([91.113.6.105]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MJXEd-1Wo2up06Wp-0032UL; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 14:31:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <538B03D4.6030502@swipnet.se> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:iLFblbyuC1QDpDpVxu0JffSlTxNDeqKTXXupfBEz+IbaXwoRTpK lra8ouo8hb63HYpvO7dzbZHC/t4ZFqXdasNXHiwYl9EoaQI06+5ePkEJ3nL+3cQwvC1AnRq v/lpr98ZVx3aMq9AfehKeHcyEGMDJKz6d4Ph1kPJe8aufYG1E6PbcTMviFz9GhKZwLjmrx2 7qm6r8kzBDmc67+TsRbyw== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172239 Archived-At: > + position = value; How/why does this value differ from that returned by gtk_adjustment_get_value? As an aside: Why is the third argument of x_send_scroll_bar_event called PORTION while inherently it's a POSITION relative to WHOLE? Doesn't such nomenclature clash with that of say XTset_vertical_scroll_bar where PORTION represents the size of the slider wrt WHOLE? martin