From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: window--dump-frame Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 12:09:01 +0200 Message-ID: <5381C13D.5030107@gmx.at> References: <537DA243.9070306@gmx.at> <8761kxrdm6.fsf@zigzag.favinet> <87lhtthrw3.fsf@zigzag.favinet> <87ha4giflm.fsf@zigzag.favinet> <877g5agqcf.fsf@zigzag.favinet> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401012577 32270 80.91.229.3 (25 May 2014 10:09:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 10:09:37 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 25 12:09:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WoVMw-0005RO-1k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 12:09:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50878 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoVMv-0000mm-JR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 06:09:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49089) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoVMl-0000mV-Va for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 06:09:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoVMb-0001bV-2U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 06:09:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:63730) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoVMa-0001b0-Ol for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 06:09:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.118.141.210] ([194.118.141.210]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MWPOI-1XM2va3MXy-00Xeea for ; Sun, 25 May 2014 12:09:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877g5agqcf.fsf@zigzag.favinet> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:/621yvTlt6j/+VGK+qY+jjM3kbigxCoefSZJfv0DJn9uW9g6umG vdz6nG5iaSzp2DD7cqGAdEGDR86liJkyADuwMiwg3XFBVTXWMLSqaTs6paC+Fb3uiGOgfVx mhCJ0vsxvU6QyVpS9+772FLKlfmXzTk8lswrX/3cLlYFhM1aLoWcurhpTh9mPLORuoL6dIU xwYx5rkHTuRW3A5F5Tk9w== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172074 Archived-At: > Anyway, i've said my piece. I hope the function author > reconsiders things, and promise not to say "i told you so" > should things veer weird w/ those pesky users... :-D Since I have no opinion I removed the specification now. martin