From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17554: 24.3.91; [Regression] re-usage of dired *Marked Files* buffer window Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 09:24:23 +0200 Message-ID: <537EF7A7.8040608@gmx.at> References: <22309.78500.835208.21374@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <44983.87719.904757.21374@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1400829932 7619 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2014 07:25:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 07:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17554@debbugs.gnu.org To: Roland Winkler , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 23 09:25:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjr1-0003i4-SS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 09:25:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41444 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjqz-0003fu-C9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:25:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52488) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjqo-0003ff-WA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:25:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjqh-0000b3-5N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:25:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjqh-0000aN-1J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjqg-0007jq-Fv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 07:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17554 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17554-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17554.140082988929716 (code B ref 17554); Fri, 23 May 2014 07:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17554) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2014 07:24:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57210 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WnjqT-0007jE-3M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:24:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:53888) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WnjqQ-0007ir-6z for 17554@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:24:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [93.82.15.238] ([93.82.15.238]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M7UUd-1WzKbd3vOx-00xJYT; Fri, 23 May 2014 09:24:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <44983.87719.904757.21374@gargle.gargle.HOWL> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:2H2MMrXv6aLUjKprRtakSUq/K9eFMlycmHTc8KP0PYZuJ1ZOCdi s2YpHMI7Et57TjVjhRWlfFdta9WKb539kaxc58B8uXNARj8gfmZ+fGCk8wwYYFQfMhjvVUA el/fZ9XfbAzxgUKoOSjWr6B5ZM7fAScU+V8epryiVSuPYjAUP15lFyoCLwLVHjCbczibEHf i/EUh6DMFH+fng6S0GzeQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89385 Archived-At: > Emacs 24.3 does not give me this problem (I just double-checked): IIUC we now use `display-buffer' for displaying the list of marked files and completions and both seem to backfire in the present case. > First it gives me the *Marked Files* window by splitting the main > window (only two lines high if I want to move only two files, > whereas 24.3.91 makes it three lines high). A regression. It happens because `display-buffer-pop-up-window' obeys `window-min-height' which is 4, by default. Subtracting one for the mode-line gives three lines. If you mark at least three files you won't see it. We could add a `window-height' alist entry to fix this. Juri - any ideas where? My knowledge of `dired' is about zero so I don't want to add any such switch without some advice. > Then it splits once more the main window for the *Completions* > buffer. So I get a *Completions* window which is typically large > enough to display the complete *Completions* buffer. Which is much better indeed. You can customize `split-height-threshold' to get three windows again - the *Completions* buffer then appears at the bottom when the question is asked. But the default would really look better with three windows. Juri - any ideas? martin