From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: window--dump-frame Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 09:07:47 +0200 Message-ID: <537DA243.9070306@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1400742515 29945 80.91.229.3 (22 May 2014 07:08:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 07:08:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 22 09:08:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WnN75-0005P5-T7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 09:08:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35191 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnN75-0004A3-Cx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 03:08:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32991) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnN6u-00040q-Ve for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 03:08:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnN6n-0008Vb-CX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 03:08:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:56023) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnN6e-0008UG-VR; Thu, 22 May 2014 03:08:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [88.117.80.33] ([88.117.80.33]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LhSfM-1X9DTQ45eC-00ma58; Thu, 22 May 2014 09:07:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:xzOD9p4/+c9OkzXhR2XhSh5O04c2OQnn7TOraXqNVE+bq0mKClu OqubFN+C4ZQDE8Y+g2Jx7C5QudSBBzBuH3XuIAMTbcgQIWxvEinU8fMs4m7UUkF10kEPyV2 E/94h+7/A10nQqGAwLMZO5GYdvwn8zhPsF2uM8kuTFcR+Cc/BKsSvJ30oDm2dB0yvwDIPHI EEsLy8NG8tLdNAHORL82w== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172017 Archived-At: > Is window--dump-frame supposed to be interactive? For getting more information from a bug reporter it's slightly easier to say "do M-x window--dump-frame" than "do M-: (window--dump-frame)". That's all. If you think it should be changed, please do that. martin