From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r117002: Correctly treat progn contents as toplevel forms when byte compiling Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:04:14 -0700 Message-ID: <5356A10E.8090900@dancol.org> References: <535558EA.7070506@dancol.org> <53559BD2.3000006@dancol.org> <5355D244.2050104@dancol.org> <5355F442.6080606@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GUN3OxeAVTEstmn72aDWIlJt0xqVVbiLs" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1398186277 28996 80.91.229.3 (22 Apr 2014 17:04:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 22 19:04:32 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wce7S-0000yW-UX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:04:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56295 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wce7S-0005BQ-3f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:04:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53170) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wce7O-0005Aq-Sv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:04:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wce7I-0000On-Q0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:04:26 -0400 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:46119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wce7I-0000Oj-E9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:04:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=LwpYTusWoAKwjr7S4I2inba7GGXODOUG4TqC9PnBsoE=; b=AUc4E4dlRNYM49IBGYpww3EJSb4DJMTjXpSD18tlPqdL6bIztgHkXJjOTQAtuvSxUUJJILJiUw6rk9A9k2bDbBz3MnvvsqanOtIr576H0/8RXlVrl30SyaFOF5lkuHG4kdmYo6hpB1RFPrjzsaSSmtw3KIcZBaMeZOLf9+fkrz1KL7BarKJOtqYujGcllsXBLXmVlaB5k+lEBHedkVs9DWZwtWMQuuYomeGjgRk2BsDQjn3qqOXZ1ObvzGpDZx8mLUL1F1BcJI5NUQ0nipDqCNLB3Ff/EgaTi3Px++1NnMsxbCs4LDPInFhmTqGAOLOGpidwULYvzyRza+GZ0mj9eQ==; Original-Received: from [2601:8:b200:2b6::2b1] by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Wce7G-0000Lk-MO; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:04:18 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:171581 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --GUN3OxeAVTEstmn72aDWIlJt0xqVVbiLs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/22/2014 08:20 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> `(defun ,member-name (,inst-arg &rest xargs) >> ,doc >> (declare (advertised-calling-convention (,inst-arg ,@xarglist= ) >> ,emacs-version)) >> (apply (cl-struct-slot-value ',iface-name ',member-name ,inst= -arg) >> ,inst-arg xargs))))) >=20 > I think we'd be just as happy, with something like >=20 > (defun method-call (method inst &rest args) > (apply (funcall method inst) inst args)) >=20 > instead of defining umpteen "method call wrappers". That way, you don't get docstrings, parameter-number checking, eldoc, and so on. And you have to be aware that you're using this odd calling convention instead of just calling a function like you would any other. I'd much rather have the wrappers, which we can inline and make practically free. --GUN3OxeAVTEstmn72aDWIlJt0xqVVbiLs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTVqEOAAoJEMAaIROpHW7I9bUP/1dvLrCuiZNsccA9XFchg57y 0Kx/7vGC2nKNa5wTzA8aqkDXy7G/Bj7IV1MqDuahRs73is+zi8XUN08s8fs7EvWy qGVIqwZhq5YhYAs4l1/gcfjCEpeBb4fpAHWeSFZExC5dOYUJPFK/+Oa2sSkMxxDm /5Bhesm3IUTO0M2VYUKj+vvMRE2KaQ/pVs2lJewEGhtUVRDqZQpt11nzVQ+Egjx9 bm/z20MedFNaIM3cxtu7kC7NocihPh4W4guLHrVPmK5NINNgy8xd/gzShS8eXsTS kCAvpyfaYAcEQBHYT7M+ZEz2LknZEcJBnV7tQZK82nETwHxs2KSoURrZb1THFqB6 x2aHG8Iofm/rCcyW2C017uJMgAA56ivS7zUHNVVTO8rWfxUZjSujx1rtEZge3rts SWZlRPR0k94J5iKQnchIGcZjutoxThvFcUEjQnMlwHrff+pLlutaIt1j0G4/Y+KQ 9Mn2Egew0XCj4zeD3CHRD/qMq4ELVp4/wfOcqmD8iWqQQQ1Ag9PuW3XUuZ56tiV6 QSs15c838JFzTQ9J9XkZM0JjvqKV/i8IFHyu/ZSpc/iLPIW9Ep72hRK9tdRLROrj Ow6ndjXeRrWgIKhlfA6u/NBA8O3XxNy/FtDOKg597SACgXLjj+7rFHFQUnJxUzHa zxsF3Y/KVK742C6WrhD2 =H+HL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GUN3OxeAVTEstmn72aDWIlJt0xqVVbiLs--