From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r117000: Untabify cl-macs.el Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:22:21 -0700 Message-ID: <535561DD.2040606@dancol.org> References: <5354663D.3050107@dancol.org> <837g6jduo5.fsf@gnu.org> <5354C519.9090005@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IIIon8PldCoIa4keCxFMxUWWt07t9pWwI" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1398104555 4565 80.91.229.3 (21 Apr 2014 18:22:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel To: Josh Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 21 20:22:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WcIrO-0004I9-4N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 20:22:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50782 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcIrN-0002ud-Gs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:22:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52363) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcIrK-0002uW-3w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:22:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcIrJ-0004Qa-36 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:22:26 -0400 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:39976) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcIrH-0004QH-6F; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:22:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=Pr9fUSiCOj9WU2kdZ+E6YyVBAdqoxb0MO8/Sj/xKuaM=; b=oDKnRPAMuA45O+pol5cixJDZqe+Rxt+mQ8Gi1k1IuE5NU647Fz2Dy9KUK1J1PyKe1ZwjRBqmp5RrWoIt7vHcztgIp/SYZ9pJeqPN1rRLNoxb5Z0aQiYd/GWhkC8hI+o7DOiP0lEInyM9vJQ8mwnM8cLf157FLAPkl9QrgceO2PNiz8aENviI5bSqfFjQiOPa/z2/R+JNrcS6oDQL/hOt9q1v5hiA+x6lQnXY4LKkxAmheDxUeSYBOJ2yaFcg4x5MCTAJBJ9LMBgTnzYosMPi9wPjbHPuYBSaMIF8QTSdByuYMw0WmW9yOQHBZJJRIZ258e1EdunfxF2Cly0382Vp0g==; Original-Received: from [2601:8:b200:2b6::2b1] by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WcIrG-0003IC-8m; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:22:22 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:171544 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --IIIon8PldCoIa4keCxFMxUWWt07t9pWwI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/21/2014 11:17 AM, Josh wrote: > I've sometimes wondered why trunk/.dir-locals.el doesn't also specify > indent-tabs-mode, but I found the rationale in this thread[0] from=20 > several years ago. Still, it would be nice to find a way to avoid the > battle Eli mentioned so people could C-x h C-M-\ with less risk that > their personal indentation preferences would introduce gratuitous=20 > whitespace changes. >=20 > [0] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2009-01/msg00058.html= We could introduce another indent-tabs-mode setting that would tell Emacs, for each line to be indented, to use tabs if that line is already indented with tabs, to use spaces if the line is already indented with spaces when a tab could have been used, and to use spaces (or tabs) otherwise --- but considering how touchy and particular people have seemed to be about this issue, I wouldn't expect much support for anything but the inconsistent status quo. --IIIon8PldCoIa4keCxFMxUWWt07t9pWwI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTVWHdAAoJEMAaIROpHW7INq8P/11VHJEUH8y3NMx8mdhiwhmZ PSPd5ZxyFwMr538J1f0tKuJM47D6/tTkDIz6bV39Dcy2SVFJjUSmp4K9ORJMAWH7 4xTxVKLvOyMuzX2U0ijzv4R2mXoH2mVgcO7yu5uO7IzzRHRvfH0Fsvr8tzRtTDAI 2Anr+Ebc8aDhhM08+n7pN40qZ/vmnB9kT0ZRwEvXC719Oumn7nvZ2UrY3m04q5zU ksQEXGd+TQbyPXOLoxKoM9h3VyIVlXSdPP0f0hW3Ac8f/YYbuloA282XccTc/aXO DqSMompf1o9HY35STJo8qOhDBpoNPz05oxQvmdP63vcup8wuAScERmKqy84eWYj+ vb9PXN7lySvx+OGOm0ic4Viv1NUK02f2HNm4dNkl2yGo2cUXBc/7xjoGjddMd59k Q7tadXE7LLdkG3+jV7PUQwEk+1+4k9ldUey2z3GPbjah5Y2HvHnmV/AShNSgxGaU rpUz2HLSd1JHUfnG9ADCV6HKQNlTQTbOokEln4mPqaQUUb9wZWsBVOFzZAEvQHt/ 7YG20fTcOSpbSVoXDofAoCCTWq1Qfh1ZPKMpM5OZac252Bx86pHQGB66mExyIiBZ IBRFxPTZ1exz03lXwi9sFmV2Xqnpv7g/jr8nX0gRd8xhyCv5cdLHakpelNeAS214 4B0rnRRsK3GPl1s0XO16 =LTcZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IIIon8PldCoIa4keCxFMxUWWt07t9pWwI--