From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Markus Gritsch" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fwd: Loading ebrowse file yields warning Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:55:54 +0200 Message-ID: <533b7d320710120455i63db49b1kedf3fd4a840c189a@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1192190266 22331 80.91.229.12 (12 Oct 2007 11:57:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:57:46 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 12 13:57:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IgJ7i-0002nF-3m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:56:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgJ7b-0003yW-U2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IgJ7X-0003xF-S5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:55:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IgJ7V-0003x3-LD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:55:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgJ7V-0003x0-Fx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:55:57 -0400 Original-Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.186]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IgJ7V-0000iW-1Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:55:57 -0400 Original-Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c27so703082rvf for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:55:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=fugH/IS6wn6Htc/UzEkfzg7l0J254h5XF3H5Rc6xHQM=; b=ox0WIlEhFMS0XJjh+7nfzmetI+nLE73+gFkd5FwKmGSUl+5IfKxvG99PfRpgsEOU3SLSQy16zRado+hfvlAzZZNkRoC68Wu6ho8qIPqvnFTj2uyAnwnC8w+UCaqex5ZpNNJL06vbTEBG7xwIOS+svyd0I1roJPEaIu9Je8pFQGI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=uY59NHSpbSXgbagHfKKfZlleKmec31GLHegd33cLvC3mKp5z0WvRFAsyKiZy2/SLXL23Bwz9lNSk+Mgzw7VMyXAq0AlR8HZ2JQ9tKZPALX8eRF2x7GvzvIN3h56JvsgD2Za3HxFHXIiO37E14tDtyElgnITVHUByb/3t+Aq8bAE= Original-Received: by 10.141.137.8 with SMTP id p8mr1434420rvn.1192190154807; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.141.195.3 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80707 Archived-At: Glenn Morris-3 wrote > Richard Stallman wrote: > > > No, it's 100% correct: the BROWSE buffer is "internal" like the > > TAGS buffer for etags. > > > > Ok. Could someone please do it? > > (Turn off undo for the BROWSE buffer.) > > If these buffers are "internal", should they be hidden (which would > turn off undo)? No, the buffer should not be hidden. Kind regards, Markus