From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matthias Dahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16434: bug#16694: bugs #16694/#16378: Patches Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:15:27 +0100 Message-ID: <5335920F.4030008@binary-island.eu> References: <52F601AE.5040309@binary-island.eu> <87k3bj40nu.fsf@cougar.home.aneadesign.com> <83wqfiz36v.fsf@gnu.org> <5331D45B.7090704@binary-island.eu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1396019775 17367 80.91.229.3 (28 Mar 2014 15:16:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16694@debbugs.gnu.org, 16434@debbugs.gnu.org, Clemens =?UTF-8?Q?Sch=C3=BCller?= To: Barry OReilly Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 28 16:16:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WTYW5-0006QS-JK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:16:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34135 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTYW4-0005NX-UD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:16:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTYVt-0005Hb-Po for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:16:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTYVm-0005IV-BP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:16:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTYVm-0005IR-8T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WTYVl-00076e-Mv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:16:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Matthias Dahl Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16434 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16434-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16434.139601973427269 (code B ref 16434); Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16434) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2014 15:15:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54993 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WTYVK-00075k-64 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:15:34 -0400 Original-Received: from hemera.binary-island.eu ([97.107.138.233]:39904) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WTYVH-00075Y-8f; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:15:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.0.0.20] (95-90-43-88-dynip.superkabel.de [95.90.43.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hemera.binary-island.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F2B63C0D5; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:21:46 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87487 Archived-At: Hello @all. Sorry for my late reply. I was _really_ busy this week. :( @Barry: Thanks for all your investigative work. Unfortunately I fear you are somewhat barking up the wrong tree (= function). :) I am pretty sure I've found the real culprit but the fix is a bit more involved, if I am right. I still need to do a few more tests and think about a solution that works without side-effects and is as non-invasive as possible. If nobody minds, give me a few more days (still a bit busy here) and I will see if I can get a patch out for testing asap. Thanks for the patience in advance. :-) So long, Matthias