From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r116836: Avoid GC crashes. Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:54:31 -0700 Message-ID: <532F2DE7.6050303@dancol.org> References: <532CCE2F.1030406@dancol.org> <532CE5CE.8090607@dancol.org> <532CE93F.4010900@dancol.org> <87y50220rh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83ha6o3nm0.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IBCoPS0HQSGOPKjsw57c9IrREIqJk9pvw" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395600891 13715 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2014 18:54:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dak@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 23 19:55:01 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnXw-0002OU-Ju for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:55:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33043 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnXw-00025a-AG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:55:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnXp-00024Y-6A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:54:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnXk-0003Sq-KW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:45912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnXV-0003Jd-Qf; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:54:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=GUPEut5trVZ66pm/2sz+lz2+6peVL7wIebk8s1A2xo0=; b=NT4Tn0h5QhDf8sGGhX8yDECHS0qk/qviYBUWGz0a95bQFV4C+7WXYHciap7y+iAVvSw5nK/zRmoAT+58qfJOvZzb//TlMGzpLCyySc9SmrNlFvNUENU6p3vxZ81Vp4ps7u50uoI2HQYlQ4yLTbwxRgGGYc7ybCTKng8IhFT0iN2R/rEMpuO9Ciw4i8zkmvwyMYZfBqUY6Ci/Y7vmC+2BmMQcQYl8aF8admifv2t88CKyDDhxePgoBAd6tapfPoD9XnPYlMNx4/2LYBhzk0n6ghhmlIqI+sfWRKVeEKJYcIUTNavwkF4p9Yc1wp+/Snw/vMJKsLehZENE/Kj0FFVCGA==; Original-Received: from c-24-19-133-76.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([24.19.133.76] helo=[192.168.1.50]) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnXV-0003rK-46; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:54:33 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: <83ha6o3nm0.fsf@gnu.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170881 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --IBCoPS0HQSGOPKjsw57c9IrREIqJk9pvw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/23/2014 09:07 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 08:12:00 +0100 >> Cc: David Kastrup , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> Richard Stallman writes: >> >>> So there is no point bothering users of the trunk (including me) with= >>> unpredictable and unavoidable crashes. >> >> Are there any other people seeing this crash? >=20 > There were several crashes in GC reported since October, at least some > of them might be related. In bug#16901, Dmitry mentioned some of > them, but there are more. I thought you found something wrong with gmalloc to explain that one. --IBCoPS0HQSGOPKjsw57c9IrREIqJk9pvw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTLy3nAAoJEMAaIROpHW7IETEP/i9ouaxrbw8UHCn+ZImOGpJP B93Sf4MjFa95pQHl55Blj3Z3ueTcPUN1CQLgWpXRJfwV6dWPdUy06oW3MqgBsgPj OPy75dJbj4x97HHzresMp9swpIvRf2U/XmrFjkXfrnDQmiWyoihFCVaqQYCB6Cex Ly4X7cbhRJGIzRZQ/kwrejFzJtkiJ2AIvdPMeYILTLwk004AGI3VfNcnpLBWstDF u5f5+hlr0pQzHRO+v2pJed45cylgnxpAbTngTZPd7yR/oNcocUzKkFpB7zSg9O6+ euesGp+KZqQB7Q1ZfWiN7l6+/bpeg0bbyYIwyfVZCXmHOPrd8ubG3jPvXr6YKXbK Al2Tm4wivDPcd2Z7KgqTMzIQGvpG2j9r2m209BvM6tAzkBR1d+8ryqiHmVQ5xdqP +WbIAjQY7wyCRMQRQB4fpHIh42keQWW287KcNUFB4+AUzypzu5IfzlI5zd+VZ7xM wTWraZKzqE7h/fTEISI28G1vCU20zztlcjdkm3n+afeX7OJ0KyuzJcv7wT3MxsXA CoRPZRsGNfD33IQecibWrTEDiQSoYqVGGJN4vevbTknjoznl0yiMdIgcCy8fswKx MjaCViX/aToTGrQtQ6ygEgRz16aDSyHHCZRtcSqQpdeUQUDdZk+3Cs59dSoEjBYF 2UM+xGYOf1C8W7eeoeUw =zPem -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IBCoPS0HQSGOPKjsw57c9IrREIqJk9pvw--