From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matthias Dahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16378: bugs #16694/#16378: Patches Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 20:13:53 +0100 Message-ID: <5325F7F1.1070209@binary-island.eu> References: <53174D6A.7010104@binary-island.eu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1394997254 10883 80.91.229.3 (16 Mar 2014 19:14:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 19:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16378@debbugs.gnu.org To: 16694@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 16 20:14:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WPGVp-00007K-BV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 20:14:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54231 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPGVo-0005uF-OP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:14:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48463) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPGVe-0005tz-TU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:14:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPGVX-0008Uy-KA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37175) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPGVX-0008Uu-Gs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WPGVX-0007kT-2V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:14:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Matthias Dahl Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 19:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16378 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16378-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16378.139499723929760 (code B ref 16378); Sun, 16 Mar 2014 19:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16378) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Mar 2014 19:13:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38355 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WPGVS-0007jv-SG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:13:59 -0400 Original-Received: from hemera.binary-island.eu ([97.107.138.233]:36114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WPGVQ-0007ji-0X; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:13:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.0.0.20] (95-90-43-186-dynip.superkabel.de [95.90.43.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hemera.binary-island.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EAD943C0D5; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:19:55 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 In-Reply-To: <53174D6A.7010104@binary-island.eu> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86897 Archived-At: Hello @all. It's been almost two weeks since I sent the patches with absolute and rather discouraging silence in-between. :-) So I quickly wanted to ask if there is any feedback (whether good or very bad) or something that needs improving? And if there is a chance of getting those fixes applied to the tree? Thanks in advance, Matthias