From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16967: frame related race condition Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:45:49 +0100 Message-ID: <531DA5ED.6090601@gmx.at> References: <531D8028.8020807@gmx.at> <531D94CB.7020704@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1394451975 27812 80.91.229.3 (10 Mar 2014 11:46:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:46:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16967@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 10 12:46:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WMyf0-0004eo-RG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:46:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48105 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WMyf0-0005pL-E1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:46:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WMyeo-0005Ze-38 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:46:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WMyeg-0004Cy-Ps for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:46:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57569) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WMyeg-0004Cq-N9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WMyeg-00027b-2o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16967 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16967-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16967.13944519588142 (code B ref 16967); Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16967) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2014 11:45:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58751 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WMyeb-00027D-OJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:45:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:59588) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WMyeZ-000274-9W for 16967@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:45:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [178.190.166.7] ([178.190.166.7]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LqALY-1WredO0zdg-00dq37; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:45:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ts/I4/rKTG9KSK/4LxgBmq0KosDodpGn7aM0oksRWUtGHEzBLds ZgPMNrZ14AAe9+R//7FZ4oD2FprW66H222ui9L0HaKnfk2NhUQHmOwpt0d6rU9sXTT47nMu u74IAL/331WlVURiDBD5HFOyN27BtYVJ+8I54+mak+ncwJvTNCLz3j/MjRQXbaQo0vxVwSJ DRvjhAZdv8wUp5EPG67yw== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86715 Archived-At: >> I checked in a fix in revision 116716. With that I can't see the >> problem any more. Can you? > > No, but it has a much bigger problem: > > emacs -Q --eval "(make-frame '((visibility . nil)))" > > and you end with two visible frames. > > I think we're rehashing part of bug#14841's thread. When we get a SIZE_RESTORED message we have to make the frame visible. Do you see another way? martin