From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16738: Errors while resizing vertically Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:15:48 +0100 Message-ID: <530DBED4.7010902@gmx.at> References: <87y51fnx7u.fsf@gmail.com> <52FE008E.1010503@gmx.at> <53074FAE.60701@gmx.at> <5307B72B.9000808@cs.ucla.edu> <5307C53A.9070306@gmx.at> <87sir9nzqs.fsf@gmail.com> <530AF754.7050709@gmx.at> <8761o4mzh4.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393409838 14808 80.91.229.3 (26 Feb 2014 10:17:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16738@debbugs.gnu.org To: E Sabof Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 26 11:17:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WIbYG-00062P-Ib for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:17:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39390 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIbYF-0006n2-V9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 05:17:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38851) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIbY6-0006mg-Js for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 05:17:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIbXz-0006vq-AR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 05:17:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIbXz-0006vj-6f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 05:17:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WIbXy-0007EX-Qr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 05:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16738 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16738-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16738.139340976327670 (code B ref 16738); Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2014 10:16:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40390 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WIbX0-0007C6-EM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 05:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:50711) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WIbWx-0007Bg-Ec for 16738@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 05:16:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.38.172] ([62.47.38.172]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LpKKr-1WufV22bnp-00fANt for <16738@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:15:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8761o4mzh4.fsf@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:7Z4AUdS4nXFF42vRGI8oNjQ3kk9Ykh7v6HEpUIiDo1VTy8b1yI6 /3UrV+m50EtEHSvnpD0/hZj3NKjVMAeqcL5PZU6RNO0C650wR/XtMAjqkH3oT4badzZ9u93 4hxhG+YHtHID+dQkaMl3eOSn1GBvNQhPHYDl9S4maDaVH6DfDNds7XFrpCQs3YAYfFnp56Q 7p7uzu5Kdf4U+GSmVuCBQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86244 Archived-At: >> 2 canonical lines. But this is to be expected? Otherwise, Emacs would >> truncate the text line by the extra pixels needed for the mode line. > > The finer details of pixel and character coexistence on graphical frames tend escape me. If I encounter any more errors, I will report them. Suppose you have a canonical character height of 8 pixels and a header and a mode line with 2 additional pixels each. If you now set `window-min-height' to 1, Emacs will display a text line of 4 pixels height if we do not round appropriately. That wouldn't look good. martin