From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16738: Errors while resizing vertically Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 22:29:30 +0100 Message-ID: <5307C53A.9070306@gmx.at> References: <87y51fnx7u.fsf@gmail.com> <52FE008E.1010503@gmx.at> <53074FAE.60701@gmx.at> <5307B72B.9000808@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393018222 29693 80.91.229.3 (21 Feb 2014 21:30:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: E Sabof , 16738@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 21 22:30:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WGxft-0006w3-UT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 22:30:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47093 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WGxft-0003w3-J6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:30:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WGxfh-0003lp-92 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:30:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WGxfZ-0003tU-Nw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:30:13 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WGxfZ-0003sg-JI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:30:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGxfY-0001lj-Bu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:30:04 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:30:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16738 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16738-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16738.13930181836747 (code B ref 16738); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:30:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2014 21:29:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35147 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGxfD-0001kj-2v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:29:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:54703) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGxfA-0001kS-A8 for 16738@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:29:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.33.81] ([62.47.33.81]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M7H2Y-1XAJjP29Je-00x3dO for <16738@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 22:29:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5307B72B.9000808@cs.ucla.edu> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:WapLZZTkQznLQ/pVeluoZMkz7m1BTu0hw2KYsAfTZ5dmceUECch SFC8ifpd2MGbm272SKuGE5LhqnKNfT9Gjl6JmIylz7yVLKvjdfG/429SKqqWxET5I3E330h rsNg8pVeG7zNRbQD2Zj/pTdFORUkiEBtvjtzm3aVPrDH40bOyRVvZ+n7/uUtgQfwhliVu6k BEv8zzmgCsKISHQz5PvrA== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85999 Archived-At: > My change adjusted set-window-new-pixel so that it rejects attempts to > set the new pixel size to a negative value. Here, new-pixel is currently > 0, so (set-window-new-pixel window-17 t) is attempting to change > new-pixel to be -17. Indeed. Storing a negative pixel value is an error. > Are negative new-pixel values allowed? If so, the attached patch should > fix the problem. If not, the problem's probably in the caller. There was a bug in the caller - hopefully fixed now. No further action needed from your side. Thanks, martin