From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16793: window-state-put needs a live window Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:04:12 +0100 Message-ID: <5303AEAC.1030006@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392750318 2171 80.91.229.3 (18 Feb 2014 19:05:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16793@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 18 20:05:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpyr-0002fN-UR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:05:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53273 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpyr-00080W-G6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:05:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpyg-0007r2-8P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:05:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpyY-0004pe-UQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:05:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57702) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpyY-0004o2-SA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpyX-0003DY-U6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:05:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16793 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16793-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16793.139275027012294 (code B ref 16793); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16793) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2014 19:04:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58880 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpy1-0003CE-Jb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:04:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:55510) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpxy-0003Bu-TV for 16793@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:04:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.59.252] ([62.47.59.252]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MKqOW-1WFpxs0W6C-0001G0 for <16793@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:04:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:mka8r09nSAmCUB+TRJUgW8px2PqGbieAe7LaPfCwCR2E0r4OGdX 0VBKBwVLLXfs3LOLmAPGj7Xb7tBLrdf0d0kWXSHkcG9qgvOkoEbkmNrOQrIOaSFcIYFzwdz 09Gba1HIFCVnhxYSSd84Pur91f9Brlkcoacy5pl4OvLjmqRP3IY/HElXrIM844hHG2tKSmL 6feOWkcIsbWax7Ei5mB9A== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85856 Archived-At: > Martin suggests that frameset--restore should check that the root > window of the matching frame found is alive, and if not, discard that > frame and create a new one. That's doable, but it seems less than > optimal, from both a coding and UI perspective. That was a misunderstanding. Your initial scenario was emacs -Q --eval "(setq debug-on-error t)" C-x 2 C-x r f a C-x 5 2 C-u C-x r j a so I thought you wanted to create a new frame anyway ;-) martin