From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:57:57 +0200 Message-ID: <52DC6685.6020504@yandex.ru> References: <87fvqtg02v.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87y53ghe94.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87vbyk3497.fsf@yandex.ru> <87haa4gw69.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87txe4usm1.fsf@yandex.ru> <87zjnvg2t2.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87txe364q0.fsf@yandex.ru> <87r497fu0h.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87haa1litl.fsf@yandex.ru> <87y53czx7e.fsf@yandex.ru> <87bo08bivm.fsf_-_@flea.lifelogs.com> <87sitkzahs.fsf@yandex.ru> <52D7DAAB.2070709@yandex.ru> <52D81960.2080408@yandex.ru> <52DA8C17.4080707@yandex.ru> <52DC032E.2020305@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390175900 4271 80.91.229.3 (19 Jan 2014 23:58:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 20 00:58:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W52G3-0008DV-3a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:58:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48079 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W52G2-0005bz-R6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:58:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53229) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W52Fs-0005ZT-0W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:58:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W52Ff-0000Y9-6N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:58:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ee0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::233]:49558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W52Fe-0000Xp-W1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id b57so3132744eek.10 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:58:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MEXq5Gmph2d7QFGEt8mTkcslY5crUwz5giMli4JM5cM=; b=1Du7f2affzu/QzujXeCE9hF6NmRqIK565/iUIux/2IBDqDExKqiPLRdLQpP9+qgMWF Cebhna0B/w7bnfsmaCac6lMqF3WfXUTqwjQwWIa7tPaSlnMDxnOiNS5dyEkwAlsUMhkB Gw8C+nIhl5YueUXGIuhzb02stUdfdb3ozXN/QDWNNM/D3ZYpaw7+AlRraS4JJIuSdjPb 8CLgolq8V7aMLNswBtXPalMTwGolZkwnmLA3RRUGdgT1vzN3ZULxMoF3MfOIFhGk9Nay i2wS3+FpkBzSpQN92OEYlIsH6epT851DyWvWwgNDFUEalpu8AMKoRGJP27k3UoNeKfrz Db5g== X-Received: by 10.15.54.72 with SMTP id s48mr14566494eew.3.1390175882088; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:58:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.10.2] (62-126-148.netrun.cytanet.com.cy. [62.228.126.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m47sm47630363eey.7.2014.01.19.15.58.00 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:58:01 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4013:c00::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168754 Archived-At: On 19.01.2014 22:21, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I think I failed to make the connection based on "automatic completion" > (which, to be honest, doesn't mean anything to me. At best, I'd expect > it to complete the word for me without my typing anything, more like > what lightning completion does). Yes, there's also some term conflation going on: "automatic completion" in company-minimum-prefix-length docstring is not the same thing as "auto-complete" in company-auto-complete docstring. I'll try to make it more clear. Unfortunately though, "idle completion" is a less familiar term than "auto-complete", to an average user.