From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (heap 1024 82721 1933216) Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 05:51:26 -0800 Message-ID: <52DA86DE.3000401@dancol.org> References: <52DA8412.2080009@dancol.org> <83lhydjt6d.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390053107 1269 80.91.229.3 (18 Jan 2014 13:51:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 18 14:51:55 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W4WJW-0001TW-B1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 14:51:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42920 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4WJW-00052c-03 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:51:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43149) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4WJN-00052O-Gz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:51:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4WJH-0002kM-CH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:51:45 -0500 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:46115) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4WJ6-0002iR-Qp; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:51:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=s+1wM3LDHEGO7a/Dt9pqemt27/UQO/S+8ugRn5/XorY=; b=Tq3XBvzEazCTHogITDnL/0xD3w+rcsookU6nkW0/0d7KrNrp+vRMS1L5tDIl3Q5GLw2jG19yDCGR5nc3FaEIw8zikJfLmtSG/ewKOlQD2e2lY4Qk0enEPtC49LhCdATvm1fKiX7su3JKgPRSAU6F326qpgDg28ImHvWHiPqrNlPRFtYjMwf8qKjsbLZ+K8M+NSb7DUR2FIDX/eRDgpP13QnQpSNS6jSrPjIPoaqPgzlDVPjU6vaKcX2VQS+2NvRwvttA2G1c1FWHtVzyg5dlZyxVsGsBSDZ0Wx3E4bTuQIioHuqWNAoBtMDDhn/yYt5R1DV/pNTYCYt5rkrr9jJbFw==; Original-Received: from c-76-104-210-106.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([76.104.210.106] helo=[192.168.1.50]) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1W4WJ6-0005pq-0l; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 05:51:28 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: <83lhydjt6d.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168683 Archived-At: On 01/18/2014 05:50 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 05:39:30 -0800 >> From: Daniel Colascione >> >> On Emacs trunk, I recently got into a situation where Emacs had a vsize >> of over 6GB. After killing all buffers, garbage-collect reported (heap >> 1024 82721 1933216) as the most interesting part of its on its return >> value. dlmalloc's free memory retention seems a bit severe here. Are we >> just badly fragmenting the heap? > > Buffers are not allocated off the heap, as you well know. No, but their buffer locals might be.