From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16306: 24.3.50; font change creates blank column on Lucid Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:13:20 +0100 Message-ID: <52C5AC40.3050408@gmx.at> References: <8361q51m42.fsf@gnu.org> <52C2AB99.6040503@gmx.at> <52C3045C.7030303@gmx.at> <52C3F773.1030804@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388686461 31773 80.91.229.3 (2 Jan 2014 18:14:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 18:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16306@debbugs.gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 02 19:14:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vymml-0006we-DZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:14:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46475 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vymmk-0003s1-TU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:14:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51497) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vymma-0003eG-W9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:14:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VymmQ-0001bZ-Hw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:14:12 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44287) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VymmQ-0001bO-FC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VymmQ-0002mV-0Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:14:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 18:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16306 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16306-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16306.138868640710626 (code B ref 16306); Thu, 02 Jan 2014 18:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16306) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2014 18:13:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58306 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vymlr-0002lK-15 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:13:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:56068) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vymlo-0002lB-RF for 16306@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:13:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.54.254] ([62.47.54.254]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M3NEK-1V7v8M3Z1E-00qwIa for <16306@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:13:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:oUjPwOefPias+IoSMMQwht3JOSq3Z31f1eNmnQchMYEwYd0UwIN xlqAW9rlcby2+VqlASQhB9P45A/ov4eH35NUNBTM/bcRXociFqoAMPDUfrfSN9dFZ0hg0qY TMmthGDy+zDnIBh5G3jaatoC7ugqYyB1gY7jpNKYs3vbKBd7QxXm+Jw+eq072xxD36g0UVw OhSjcWqcANaNDB7OP5yJw== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82835 Archived-At: > It is the window manager "quartz-wm" that reduces the width from 1166 > to 1162, probably because it respects the size hint that was set in > update_wm_hints (in widget.c). There, the value of base_width/height > is calculated using the width/height of the frame *before* resizing. What r=F4le does base_width play here? If it prevailed, we could never resize a frame to any size but the present one. martin