From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16115: 24.3.50; doc string of `display-buffer-in-side-window' - there is no SIDE arg Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 18:16:45 +0100 Message-ID: <52AC927D.9060607@gmx.at> References: <97eeb516-4c10-4ed9-8934-932366fc3ce5@default> <52A8A708.9070801@gmx.at> <52A98C71.4090109@gmx.at> <52A9FBDA.6050207@gmx.at> <87fvpw25yx.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387041437 7121 80.91.229.3 (14 Dec 2013 17:17:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 17:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16115@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 14 18:17:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrsq8-0006pQ-B8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 18:17:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48082 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrsq7-0007W1-Sp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:17:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51268) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrspx-0007Vt-OY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:17:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrspq-0000lr-EG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:17:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36234) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrspq-0000ln-Ai for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrspq-0001T2-3d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 17:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16115 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16115-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16115.13870414155622 (code B ref 16115); Sat, 14 Dec 2013 17:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16115) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2013 17:16:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50253 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrspi-0001SZ-QU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:16:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:52104) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrspf-0001SQ-HQ for 16115@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:16:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.42.92] ([62.47.42.92]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MSHax-1VzQ2T1HD9-00TYPg for <16115@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 18:16:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87fvpw25yx.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:R8RWnVVXFUN69salKobwLVQjNTrKusfwJzojv7b6UO5d+JrOuRZ rISjongceuGLf8Vv33QY0N7lYWFSdTyC5OAO3/B5mgqOO2si5lPi8F2h5Ac5IvC+6FFKERB bMF6ySsUnxhrvCApbpyI/UF3P+apqlREOgYbRgH55RF4cJYInrT5hI56acC7GMkTAgeqS4a wNxVK47FxuoZCDikZ+iSA== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81967 Archived-At: > Shouldn't `display-buffer-below-selected' display the buffer below, > and not on the right? I.e. like you recently added the let-binding > `(split-width-threshold)' to `display-buffer-at-bottom', > it would also make sense to do the same by moving the let-binding > `(split-height-threshold 0)' to `display-buffer-below-selected'. I bound `split-width-threshold' to nil as in `display-buffer-at-bottom'. The value of `split-height-threshold' should be left to the user here, IMO. But if you insist that binding it to zero is better, I certainly won't object. martin