From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16115: 24.3.50; doc string of `display-buffer-in-side-window' - there is no SIDE arg Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:22:43 +0100 Message-ID: <52AC3F83.8080204@gmx.at> References: <97eeb516-4c10-4ed9-8934-932366fc3ce5@default> <52A8A708.9070801@gmx.at> <52A98C71.4090109@gmx.at> <52A9FBDA.6050207@gmx.at> <23c0d954-512b-424f-af95-c4b5af6d1cd8@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387020200 26723 80.91.229.3 (14 Dec 2013 11:23:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 11:23:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16115@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 14 12:23:25 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VrnJc-000303-CA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:23:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46833 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrnJb-0001Wa-UT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 06:23:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrnJO-0001QD-Hz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 06:23:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrnJH-0006eM-4j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 06:23:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrnJH-0006eI-0c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 06:23:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrnJG-0007a1-Jw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 06:23:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 11:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16115 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16115-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16115.138702017129105 (code B ref 16115); Sat, 14 Dec 2013 11:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16115) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2013 11:22:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49306 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrnJ4-0007ZL-GS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 06:22:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:56455) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrnJ2-0007ZD-7o for 16115@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 06:22:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.61.64] ([62.47.61.64]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LrePN-1VOWr41r8n-013R4c for <16115@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:22:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <23c0d954-512b-424f-af95-c4b5af6d1cd8@default> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:QcnF/g6W1IO6a4M7vj8bjeQLw5bqhwG3vZr3cRpRWIispUd1kjE LF4KGPjStHRS4bBu5bJNoV+n9rXifQOkgdHZzi0AyqRdbJxfR6xEvEh/UfeDs4KkjqliYf4 vqlcYW1VwmAXIDIR3w/seyi0frkEGidJp4rSeoX+8HyBkIJOrG8fXy0D1RgHFFQmS1rIPGG kx9GQSKclQcIomts47VrA== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81940 Archived-At: > Apparently the OP would like the behavior to be similar to what `C-x 3' > does. Is that what `display-buffer-below-selected' always does? Perhaps > you'd like to post an answer to him directly on StackOverflow. > > Of if not, I can transfer any answer you provide here to him there. > But I would just be an uninformed middleman, as I'm no authority on > `display-buffer-below-selected' or `split-height-/width-threshold', > to put it mildly. The OP should post a request on this list so we can talk things over. martin