From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16028: 24.3.50; Latest build completely breaks my thumnail frames code Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:13:02 +0100 Message-ID: <52AADDAE.7030302@gmx.at> References: <746cd4cb-c69d-4cff-8dee-f7ccde3cb2f4@default> <52A1E5A6.3010901@gmx.at> <52A1F967.5070403@gmx.at> <6ee939f5-138d-4e5c-830e-8a20f8e45bea@default> <52A207C5.4070404@gmx.at> <12e899a3-dbf2-4b44-9b87-a0b9fc24f317@default> <52A2EE7B.4030105@gmx.at> <723644fb-f171-4bed-b8d0-7f9a1c8b9f7d@default> <52A4428F.4030101@gmx.at> <600e7b0c-73bb-4163-8d03-a8579f250045@default> <52A4B23E.9080609@gmx.at> <837gbeymiy.fsf@gnu.org> <52A60DD2.1020303@gmx.at> <83r49lxsxf.fsf@gnu.org> <52A6ED85.8020206@gmx.at> <52A6F1C4.3040803@gmx.at> <941b1292-a5c6-442d-afe8-d83aebf4b41c@default> <52A734F2.8020203@gmx.at> <52A98D4A.5000000@gmx.at> <039ebe72-12f8-49df-ae49-f1b7c56302e5@default> <52A9FC07.7040304@gmx.at> <3f787f9b-58e4-40b5-b012-59bf359af421@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386929668 26232 80.91.229.3 (13 Dec 2013 10:14:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16028@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 13 11:14:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VrPlK-0003sb-OG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:14:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41232 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrPlK-0001h5-8P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 05:14:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34573) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrPl8-0001QR-GJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 05:14:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrPkw-0002bg-QW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 05:14:14 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60801) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrPkw-0002bb-MV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 05:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrPkw-00036X-EX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 05:14:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16028 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16028-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16028.138692958711822 (code B ref 16028); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16028) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2013 10:13:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46581 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrPk3-00034b-7S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 05:13:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:65309) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrPk0-00034T-VI for 16028@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 05:13:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.62.238] ([62.47.62.238]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LvzF3-1VUO4L1Eqr-017pLd for <16028@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:13:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3f787f9b-58e4-40b5-b012-59bf359af421@default> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:l0edOY7w8aSkr+3uJvNYoeghgoEYpopmbUyGERUKcDurnjFQYOF HjrbcmH1ToSGH/2mQpXHGoO9fi/K0KNxB2ll9Hs5NXZe/NcKBwE3xlhsaUy5UjiTlT3oVDU s3llTugXsJdliJUNshJfBiG8om0nlyEc9vVIf7W4tbC069lQZOwTYIK/4+am+UHV3fAS76l j6ztF5ncL25Aht55WmRiQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81862 Archived-At: >> Because that's what x_set_scroll_bar_width in frame.c does. >> Unfortunately so, IMHO. > > Well, I don't understand, but maybe I do not need to. Is that something > new? The regression is new. If the C code has always done that, it has > not been problematic for thumbnail frames before now. You've been exploiting an undocumented feature, namely that setting the scrollbar width takes as reference values the numbers of lines and columns of a frame it had before an unacknowledged action preceding the current one. > You mean the only solution is to stop using Emacs 24 after 24.3? If you insist on using the old code, maybe. >> Hopefully, scrollbars on Windows are the only problem for you. > > Well at least that is good news. As a workaround, then, I could presumably > turn off the scroll bar on thumbnail frames. That would be a fairly large > loss of functionality, but at least it would make (de)thumbifying possible > again. You should try the solution I sketched in my other mail. martin