From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16115: 24.3.50; doc string of `display-buffer-in-side-window' - there is no SIDE arg Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:09:30 +0100 Message-ID: <52A9FBDA.6050207@gmx.at> References: <97eeb516-4c10-4ed9-8934-932366fc3ce5@default> <52A8A708.9070801@gmx.at> <52A98C71.4090109@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386871818 10036 80.91.229.3 (12 Dec 2013 18:10:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16115@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 12 19:10:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VrAiK-0007S1-TG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:10:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38014 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrAiK-00053c-Ey for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:10:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50555) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrAiA-00053G-Hp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:10:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrAi3-0005P4-8C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:10:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrAi3-0005Oa-5W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:10:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrAi2-0002mx-E3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16115 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16115-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16115.138687177410675 (code B ref 16115); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16115) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2013 18:09:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46035 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrAha-0002m7-IP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:09:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:57369) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrAhY-0002lz-QE for 16115@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:09:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.35.230] ([62.47.35.230]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MRoyH-1VxNp42c3d-00SziK for <16115@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:09:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:I5vJ+68pKJkoqgildKCCmVARDIKQZ01djpJd6voUn2zAVx92ZYm 7Z00Nl/bZiJ49SmW8w9VkX0CsFwHNj+J6WXFyp0UZi9Yman55xU5qQZvOCJcsaQd8V0BiA/ uCScoUj3KLgbS8tk8Ab1GglWboaa1q97GTxoewJKxHnodj/ns/8FxBsMbU6v5nHLAnAHVsK vtI7HdYPNvMuIdW9zKehQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81826 Archived-At: >> `display-buffer-below-selected' or something similar might be the >> answer. Side windows serve a completely different purpose. > > Sorry, I don't understand. The requester wanted the buffer to pop up on > the right, not below. And AFAICT the code I proposed does that. Can > you elaborate? If it makes a "side window", the effect is that the new window will be permanent unless explicitly deleted. Does the requester want that? > What is the right way to pop to a buffer in a window to the right? IOW, > the request was to get the effect of `C-x 3' but with the chosen buffer, > not the same buffer, in the new window on the right. If the frame is wide enough, `display-buffer-below-selected' will display it on the right of the selected window, otherwise below. This can be tuned via `split-height-/width-threshold'. martin