From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16115: 24.3.50; doc string of `display-buffer-in-side-window' - there is no SIDE arg Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:14:09 +0100 Message-ID: <52A98C71.4090109@gmx.at> References: <97eeb516-4c10-4ed9-8934-932366fc3ce5@default> <52A8A708.9070801@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386843317 22273 80.91.229.3 (12 Dec 2013 10:15:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 10:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16115@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 12 11:15:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vr3If-0001SX-5b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:15:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34784 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vr3Ie-0006sg-NO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 05:15:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vr3IU-0006qV-4R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 05:15:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vr3IM-0002Wv-Rd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 05:15:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58948) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vr3IM-0002Wf-Ob for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 05:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vr3IL-00065C-MV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 05:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 10:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16115 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16115-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16115.138684326423321 (code B ref 16115); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 10:15:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16115) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2013 10:14:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44734 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vr3Hk-000645-3O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 05:14:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:65259) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vr3Hi-00063x-HJ for 16115@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 05:14:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.39.63] ([62.47.39.63]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LlXnX-1VJ5i748hT-00bHec for <16115@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:14:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Z25Na6tPiTT+ls2RtEquQS4+F3uazhUL5ApyAqtnTZWp46XkriV mLZB5W2VOeOmVRpNalT/QGLlYjya+y0WCSD8PTFexqAB8AXFrQIHajaBp6qT6O9sKUsXIy7 +qslBEAXRhpiWodw4FLZ42xMAQJrR9ihuOja03oFKxRCYp7vryBdwFN4V7P7YdMnZUP5Tb5 LKkReXJ83iBo03HJRSFEQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81804 Archived-At: > Wrt the function (and how I discovered its doc), I just used it in an > answer to a StackOverflow question. Dunno whether my answer is > appropriate or a good use of the function. Probably there is a simpler > and better answer. `display-buffer-below-selected' or something similar might be the answer. Side windows serve a completely different purpose. martin