From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jarek Czekalski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15876: [SPAM] bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:16:09 +0100 Message-ID: <52A81139.8040909@poczta.onet.pl> References: <867gcdiqji.fsf@somewhere.org> <86fvr09z55.fsf@somewhere.org> <83fvr01du4.fsf@gnu.org> <8638n0nj9p.fsf@somewhere.org> <86bo1eaelv.fsf@somewhere.org> <86r4a2vqbu.fsf@somewhere.org> <867gbqdisp.fsf@somewhere.org> <83haas5y88.fsf@gnu.org> <529C64C5.2040509@yandex.ru> <834n6r5edh.fsf@gnu.org> <529DAAED.9000504@yandex.ru> <83ob4y3wi5.fsf@gnu.org> <529DF416.7070807@yandex.ru> <83txeo33ls.fsf@gnu.org> <52A01D59.7030304@yandex.ru> <83lhzz2oal.fsf@gnu.org> <52A80BA8.3050403@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386746236 17440 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2013 07:17:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 07:17:16 +0000 (UTC) To: 15876@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 11 08:17:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqe2q-0001nC-5M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:17:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53448 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqe2p-00064b-N9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:17:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35893) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqe2f-0005v4-IH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:17:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqe2Z-0003Sl-A4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:17:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56924) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqe2Z-0003Sh-6g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:17:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqe2Y-0003ay-ED for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jarek Czekalski Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 07:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15876 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.138674619713783 (code B ref -1); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 07:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2013 07:16:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42708 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqe27-0003aE-Td for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:16:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34066) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqe24-0003a2-Dx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:16:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqe1x-0003Nf-V0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:16:32 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:49234) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqe1x-0003Nb-RJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:16:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35763) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqe1s-0005jm-8c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:16:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqe1l-0003LF-Vb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:16:20 -0500 Original-Received: from smtpo15.poczta.onet.pl ([213.180.142.146]:41612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqe1l-0003Ky-L4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:16:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.17.9] (cj.e-siemianowice.pl [95.215.234.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jarekczek@poczta.onet.pl) by smtp.poczta.onet.pl (Onet) with ESMTPSA id 3dfTvb2YhfzZDDHS for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:16:10 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=poczta.onet.pl; s=2011; t=1386746171; bh=KTbr1/UrCC/icc4+NkqQkxHq0J7LjIJ7L4jaYAvnUDs=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Wv/mONJ7LidFYHCUhDaOoW916jXdMUFFxafISZpxXe8/8nEfW3eah/xKf2cpY+EJW +coriWwE/09eBviqxCaNhKa8dIGu3CI2DV0R2KaOFRG0ukDDxYA2o25FrHhOlEj57q oJRXeK6RfjGe6PCdBMtYQdIO5mauVqQOmUFox6ms= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 In-Reply-To: <52A80BA8.3050403@yandex.ru> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81747 Archived-At: W dniu 2013-12-11 07:52, Dmitry Antipov pisze: > On 12/05/2013 09:36 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Next cursor movement triggers redisplay, which in turn asks for the "best > match" for 0x25b7 again. > It would be nice if the results of the "best match" calls were remembered. Assuming that the fonts don't change during Emacs run time. Jarek