From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16017: 24.3.50; windmove is broken Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 08:38:12 +0100 Message-ID: <529C38E4.1020305@gmx.at> References: <87bo1172xf.fsf@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385969962 9949 80.91.229.3 (2 Dec 2013 07:39:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 07:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16017@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 02 08:39:23 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VnO6F-0001ES-0b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 08:39:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34201 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnO6E-0004oA-J3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 02:39:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58008) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnO62-0004ap-U7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 02:39:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnO5v-0005rd-Ji for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 02:39:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnO5v-0005rW-Gj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 02:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VnO5u-00058X-LP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 02:39:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 07:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16017 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16017-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16017.138596990919689 (code B ref 16017); Mon, 02 Dec 2013 07:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2013 07:38:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VnO5M-00057U-IM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 02:38:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:63428) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VnO5I-00057D-EN for 16017@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 02:38:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.45.236] ([62.47.45.236]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LvQkh-1VfaSg3fQB-010h57 for <16017@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 08:38:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87bo1172xf.fsf@yandex.ru> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:r5vkJpxGzx86z9IfG32a3xK4XIuKq4XhbRy15/035gf3urmoY/W E4iS1+3Pj6PupYNju4hyj2P/HLgK0S5NohLEOOx/hg55FuLwW+hyeAEFPpjRub/1+hmm0cl nKFgl7LdojJV+dVSgFo2LmNJqN4PZN4g4hTttY36r9cgzy0AUcuCg4LpgpMpElmYYvD0Sza 9/RVLsd2KSlp9eRhvCPXQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81234 Archived-At: > windmove-right and windmove-down don't do anything now. As you mentioned elsewhere, this should be a consequence of the pixelwise change. Can you try to find out why it fails? In `window-in-direction' I now use `window-pixel-edges' instead of `window-edges'. Would doing the same in windmove.el fix it? martin