From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15961: 24.3.50; display-buffer-at-bottom not at bottom Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:28:14 +0100 Message-ID: <5292FC0E.4050907@gmx.at> References: <87bo1a3cxo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <5291D0B0.6020109@gmx.at> <529238DC.2030305@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385364739 22555 80.91.229.3 (25 Nov 2013 07:32:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15961@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 25 08:32:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkqea-0005Yc-DN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:32:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50060 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkqeZ-0000Pz-Rv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 02:32:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45669) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkqbX-0003fx-Dx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 02:29:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkqbO-0005Uh-TQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 02:29:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkqbO-0005Ud-Pl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 02:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VkqbO-00039F-5l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 02:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15961 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15961-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15961.138536451312066 (code B ref 15961); Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15961) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2013 07:28:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43422 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkqau-00038X-HU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 02:28:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:50524) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkqaq-00038G-Sa for 15961@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 02:28:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.41.22] ([62.47.41.22]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MRo6b-1WDbtX24Ub-00SzaQ for <15961@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:28:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zDOktJB89FnGKNyd58wHnkyUc2cfKfkopNhIzJMV+34yGg59NLA q6kXrg2YES3EhIKbCoUT6qHt+VZpRszP6U7rmHpEwRyVxIpEFRjP+uSFWPVJ+HMsHo9loC0 HZYnKGzBDLJm3MsJX4ajp7IW07yMBQ+IgUlRRw4fFXmxq4QxQnXzn4pke+WyE+h9XUIslV9 KbIQMcZ5y0ZzePofj0Tbw== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80939 Archived-At: >> If I bind `split-width-threshold' in `display-buffer-at-bottom', the >> user won't be able to override it either. > > Of course, she can, because she can set her display-buffer-alist such > that she doesn't go through display-buffer-at-bottom but through another > function of her own choosing instead. So the only viable choice is to not set `split-width-threshold' anywhere and tell the user that if she wants a window below via `display-buffer-at-bottom' she has to customize `split-width-threshold'. martin