From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:34:11 +0100 Message-ID: <528C65F3.9080502@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384932878 22855 80.91.229.3 (20 Nov 2013 07:34:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Brian Jenkins , emacs-devel , Stefan Monnier , Bozhidar Batsov , rms@gnu.org To: Josh Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 20 08:34:42 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vj2J8-0006L3-4b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:34:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53185 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vj2J7-00087z-Ks for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:34:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33909) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vj2Iy-00085Z-Fd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:34:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vj2Ir-0003f2-6v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:34:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:59852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vj2Iq-0003ek-UO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:34:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.58.179] ([62.47.58.179]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0Me8ws-1W2EuB3I4s-00Psgn for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:34:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:sNUUQNCnC/DduLc+3H/8c1z3HN6HcovG+j5NBD+h9lzFmTMkndw CyFhnve8g4R8QqJPLPNHI8hFEa3oeIBeMZiCZCJREI1OzTeJPopCcxvbDujNFDIM3/axDO6 suZM+HoBfbljK2YTDMZBhi39Qx7r7y5FJ0DBgwlLNsCTSV/Zv/5e+64/OfF1EidLU721VnX xQbZHCJI/6Ha5PjG6/cmg== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:165427 Archived-At: > Yes, that's a fair point. Is there some way we could distinguish > between such ephemeral selected-window changes and transitions from > one steady state to another? If the NORECORD argument is non-nil as in `with-selected-window', the call is usually an ephemeral one. `buffer-list-update-hook' is called only when NORECORD is nil. martin