From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13594: Planning Emacs-24.4 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:34:04 +0100 Message-ID: <528C65EC.4070903@gmx.at> References: <5289F003.5040708@gmx.at> <528A13DA.1030309@gmx.at> <528B1652.2050604@gmx.at> <87ob5fj31q.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384932921 23216 80.91.229.3 (20 Nov 2013 07:35:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13594@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Liu To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 20 08:35:25 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vj2Jo-0006dF-NR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:35:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53194 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vj2Jo-0000Xj-7f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:35:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34175) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vj2Jc-0000NM-42 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:35:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vj2JU-0003zI-Qn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:35:12 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vj2JU-0003yf-L1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:35:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vj2JT-0005vc-OM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:35:04 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:35:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13594 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 13594-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13594.138493286322730 (code B ref 13594); Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:35:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13594) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Nov 2013 07:34:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34039 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vj2Io-0005uW-Ur for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:34:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:62969) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vj2Im-0005uC-R0 for 13594@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:34:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.58.179] ([62.47.58.179]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MJWAZ-1Vhfen458d-0037FC for <13594@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:34:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87ob5fj31q.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:awlhkyfscQyB5x20kmvD1AVYDHc11lw4aNb2eNUBrvTRsR08V4v dgQ5LolhVK4HbaTm7ZxC96cm7squTLgNdqqNykB60ORY8VdvgGpoTabWo85uZbLj9ODWgfH wRKSjwdexegtmBHimkhkaUbdznmGlvOnGlvZInSDPKOLzMmXeA/5jA5E8LwTFaDZpxzWDlj tBtbAX70EPwRoyTFyb5EQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80779 Archived-At: > Do you think `display-buffer-no-window' should return 'fail instead of t > when the user overrides the default action? It certainly would indicate the intentions more clearly. > Then it could be defined as: > > (defun display-buffer-no-window (buffer alist) > (when (cdr (assq 'allow-no-window alist)) > 'fail)) > > And the user customization: > > (add-to-list 'display-buffer-alist '("\\*compilation\\*" display-buffer-no-window (nil))) Exactly. martin