From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jarek Czekalski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15899: 24.3.50; regression: `region' overlay is lower priority than default Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 10:51:55 +0100 Message-ID: <5287403B.2060302@poczta.onet.pl> References: <20137354-f982-4314-9c09-21a5fbc36557@default> <83ob5mi02j.fsf@gnu.org> <83bo1liv80.fsf@gnu.org> <87mwl58yvc.fsf@yandex.ru> <834n7dipnq.fsf@gnu.org> <5286A1AD.1080106@yandex.ru> <83wqk8hgtf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384595592 28558 80.91.229.3 (16 Nov 2013 09:53:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 09:53:12 +0000 (UTC) To: 15899@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 16 10:53:17 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VhcZ3-0000eK-KY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 10:53:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35257 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VhcZ3-0000Pi-9I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 04:53:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59311) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VhcYu-0000Pb-U3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 04:53:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VhcYp-0005F7-Ac for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 04:53:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42661) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VhcYo-0005F3-Vs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 04:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VhcYo-0000kp-Bh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 04:53:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jarek Czekalski Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 09:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15899 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15899-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15899.13845955252816 (code B ref 15899); Sat, 16 Nov 2013 09:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15899) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2013 09:52:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56680 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VhcXs-0000jM-LP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 04:52:04 -0500 Original-Received: from smtpo11.poczta.onet.pl ([213.180.142.142]:57464) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VhcXo-0000il-PW for 15899@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 04:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.17.9] (cj.e-siemianowice.pl [95.215.234.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jarekczek@poczta.onet.pl) by smtp.poczta.onet.pl (Onet) with ESMTPSA id 3dMBXp4Mxgz9ttRq for <15899@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 10:51:53 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=poczta.onet.pl; s=2011; t=1384595514; bh=EseEKInYaYD/csL4DoJRhEJal9wpbGTNU5tAv9+5cLw=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=IY7nQvbFwUnMweZZR+IVk5oCjHwSwaUVuqoSWO1jDC8uemozjRQTIFoBxRHfzEtIJ rVf4QCDtJnu4/16TQsjzh2JKVZuNDiJoIUA7nc71RSQ2dMUMCJVXj+6UDpzGK5I+Ui Cg9uL1F2puGctiFyBZPDP0IZATxv3sOKlHQRQtew= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 In-Reply-To: <83wqk8hgtf.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80634 Archived-At: W dniu 2013-11-16 09:49, Eli Zaretskii pisze: >> If the region overlay will have a high but finite and documented >> priority, that would be much better. > Which will start an "overlay priority arms race", something I loathe. From this point of view editors like Notepad are best. No races, no possibility of user or package interfering with application author's vision. But we are in Emacs. This should mean freedom to users. If a user wants to have a higher priority, why would you forbid him to do so? I can't imagine an example where infinite priority is better than a high value. Could you help with that? I guess examples of malicious users or those who don't read docs should not count. Jarek