From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: electric-indent-mode: abolition of `newline' function is not the Right Thing. Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 20:34:56 +0200 Message-ID: <525EDC50.8010401@gmx.at> References: <20131013101325.GA2621@acm.acm> <20131013140931.GC2621@acm.acm> <20131013172841.GA2498@acm.acm> <525D8946.4070406@gmx.at> <20131016171240.GA3125@acm.acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1381948522 10059 80.91.229.3 (16 Oct 2013 18:35:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 16 20:35:26 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VWVwL-0002Ox-T3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 20:35:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48889 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VWVwL-0002J8-GB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:35:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43715) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VWVwB-0002AR-DU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:35:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VWVw4-0004xS-4e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:35:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:52610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VWVw3-0004x7-SO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:35:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.47.58.166] ([62.47.58.166]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LzKyn-1VsbGN3GW9-014Uqn for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 20:35:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20131016171240.GA3125@acm.acm> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zoXznePkFbE8Q7H3tF+wrGZdY15QM6TlLZKy3v9z1ghmVZXQ6Pw OLdR43s4Jie/ojyiTmXXePba1Oz1+nJtixwQADQHVvmrrmJ5wgTpKdMKS+vtLmW4APV/7Cv YWPELrbuJxvuuGm/2/0SC55i5vj6PxlGotUpGQbGcmCKFheWREVOJXywcvU2E8OS5wlUlfY ZKYAqsgZQ20dF2O/V6iug== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164245 Archived-At: > For what you want, `newline-and-indent' exists, as you know. I've been talking about the command run by RET and that I'm lost when I run emacs -Q and try to do some editing. Otherwise, I don't care about the standard behavior because I obviously have RET run my own command. But if I were new to Emacs, I certainly would want RET to indent the new line out of the box. martin