From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph LANGE <math.semantic.web@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [export] Beamer frames containing lstlisting are no longer made
 fragile
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 15:25:52 +0100
Message-ID: <52502170.3050403@gmail.com>
References: <52330365.9090002@gmail.com> <874n9ldx0r.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50096)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <math.semantic.web@gmail.com>) id 1VSSnk-0008EH-Ei
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 10:25:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <math.semantic.web@gmail.com>) id 1VSSnd-000389-Tz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 10:25:48 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]:57667)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <math.semantic.web@gmail.com>) id 1VSSnd-00037l-Nj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 10:25:41 -0400
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id q59so4865927wes.23
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 07:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <874n9ldx0r.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Orgmode Mailing List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Eric,

I'm sorry I hadn't got back to this email – didn't notice it because of
a filtering mistake on my side.

2013-09-16 08:51 Eric S Fraga:
>> My intuition after browsing the Org source code and documentation is
>> that I should now use #+BEGIN_SRC and that then everything will be
>> handled automatically.  However the language of my listings is a
>> non-standard one, which requires a lot of custom options to the
>> lstlisting environment.
>>
>> Could anyone kindly point me to an example?
>
> I am not sure what it is you want an example of?

I was interested in an example of defining a new language, including
keywords and comment and string syntaxes etc., so that one can use it
with #+BEGIN_SRC and that the exporter (case 4 of (defun
org-latex-src-block) in ox-latex.el) will create the right
\lstset{...}\begin{lstlisting}...\end{lstlisting} output.  I presume it
boils down to adding a custom language to Babel, but that's something I
haven't done before.

> If it's how to
> configure lstlisting for a new language, here are two examples:

Thanks!  With this way I'm familiar.  In case it may be of interest to
anyone, I recently made public a LaTeX package with \lstdefinelanguage
settings for a lot of languages I am interested in (mainly from the
Semantic Web): https://github.com/clange/latex/blob/master/lstsemantic.sty.

Cheers,

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Lange, School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham
http://cs.bham.ac.uk/~langec/, Skype duke4701

→ Mathematics in Computer Science Special Issue on “Enabling Domain
  Experts to use Formalised Reasoning”; submission until 31 October.
  http://cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/formare/pubs/mcs-doform/