From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15382: desktop restores buffers in wrong order Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:45:45 +0200 Message-ID: <5237FA99.3020103@gmx.at> References: <87y56ypiwv.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <5235DBEA.9020503@gmx.at> <87ob7ssbyh.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1379400440 12935 80.91.229.3 (17 Sep 2013 06:47:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15382@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 17 08:47:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VLp4D-0006O3-H9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:47:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38415 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VLp4C-0004o5-Nx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:47:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33290) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VLp42-0004nd-Hu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:47:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VLp3v-0000Zj-7A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:47:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34434) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VLp3v-0000Zb-3U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VLp3u-0001wE-Fa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15382 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15382-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15382.13794003647377 (code B ref 15382); Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15382) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2013 06:46:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42727 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VLp2x-0001uv-GO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:50506) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VLp2t-0001uH-VL for 15382@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:46:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.47.32.106] ([62.47.32.106]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MSMKx-1VVss622h9-00TY4S for <15382@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:45:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ob7ssbyh.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:CWHbnDcYLbmjvrkSwb0O0Gq8pLIXhdTC3uPD+GpCdUU7YJL8u2j Xc8SPwQNEQ/OcWRVe02P7EEhMiLrQs8xv/WlOVnq0fiw81j/OONn1W+8WZQvUsqJmQHRuos uLyNSCxftrhrjYhSARCgK3RAXNGYXCyD+vqzPqzkEkwvzefwmmRkPKqIgihpyRcF89xn5XJ Hhcw5xr3cPBBZzpyiMcnA== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:78478 Archived-At: > A question whether such non-existent buffers should be also > saved/restored is a separate question. Maybe they should, > with some empty placeholder buffers if buffer content > can't be restored? That's how it behaved initially using `get-buffer-create' IIRC. But then people complained ... martin