From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug tracker automated control server message Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 15:07:53 +0200 Message-ID: <5221EAA9.4070105@gmx.at> References: <5221A64B.5000207@gmx.at> <5221AB9F.7090209@gmx.at> <83fvtqdr7t.fsf@gnu.org> <5221E805.9010303@gmx.at> <87k3j22eqc.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1377954497 19250 80.91.229.3 (31 Aug 2013 13:08:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 13:08:17 +0000 (UTC) To: martin rudalics , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 31 15:08:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VFkuW-0007DL-Rf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 15:08:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54829 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFkuW-00080c-AO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:08:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39379) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFkuM-0007pm-FJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:08:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFkuF-0003Rg-0u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:08:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:60985) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFkuE-0003QM-OE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:07:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.47.33.26] ([62.47.33.26]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LgI0W-1VlVDV3Sku-00ne0E for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 15:07:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87k3j22eqc.fsf@engster.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:KyZTTfyfY6YN64dQsERyYYyCTlZ8kK9CBE6l9vZNwtnEHfrEYNQ jsFpB+GveDASi9He2za2xg1OzSJDkDTAhZ15OTzDHPohv4dt7fvvsAFpnEW16XJde4Gw/w/ TnCQJcVmYyo+7T58PV1XD7JegITWNMcgdR6z9ynGqvkSQ2C3vGu/uN9wjxWfk1jwD1b2msN mdGQnPQTx8cVV0vJXpXng== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163114 Archived-At: >> But this behavior of the tracker is new? > > No, this happened because you also send the mail to the control server > at control@debbugs. My guess is that you did a wide reply on a message > were control@debbugs was in the CC without you noticing. > > This is why the control@debbugs address should usually go in the BCC, so > that people who do a wide reply do not mail the control server by > accident. Thanks. Eli merged the bugs and that's apparently how control@debbugs came in. I didn't know about the consequences. martin